Re: 7191 - recommended

What do people think?  RECOMMENDED or SHOULD ?
Please reply.

I don't feel strongly.  Just wondering what would make specs clearer and 
easier to read.

All the best, Ashok


Doug Davis wrote:
>
> No real feeling either way about this.  But since "RECOMMENDED" was 
> one of the RFC2119 terms mentioned in the specs it seemed safe to make 
> the change I did.  If you'd like to swap it for "SHOULD" then go ahead 
> and open up an issue so the WG can decide that one - that's exceeding 
> my editor (monkey) role  :-)
>
> thanks
> -Doug
> ______________________________________________________
> STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
> (919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
> The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.
>
>
> *ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>*
>
> 08/18/2009 06:13 PM
> Please respond to
> ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
>
>
> 	
> To
> 	Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
> cc
> 	public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org, 
> public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
> Subject
> 	Re: 7191 - recommended
>
>
>
> 	
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Doug:
> RFC 2119 defines Recommended as equivalent to Should.
> I'm wondering if changing all occurrences of Recommended to Should.would
> be clearer for American speakers?
> All the best, Ashok
>
>
> Doug Davis wrote:
> >
> > Doing 7191 (transfer 2119 terms) I came across some uses of
> > 'recommended' in the security section that seems clear to be real uses
> > of 2119 terms so I made them upper case.  Again - if this is an issue
> > let me know.
> >
> > thanks
> > -Doug
> > ______________________________________________________
> > STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
> > (919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
> > The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.
>

Received on Tuesday, 18 August 2009 22:41:28 UTC