Re: 7191 - recommended

No real feeling either way about this.  But since "RECOMMENDED" was one of 
the RFC2119 terms mentioned in the specs it seemed safe to make the change 
I did.  If you'd like to swap it for "SHOULD" then go ahead and open up an 
issue so the WG can decide that one - that's exceeding my editor (monkey) 
role  :-)

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.



ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> 
08/18/2009 06:13 PM
Please respond to
ashok.malhotra@oracle.com


To
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc
public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org, public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Subject
Re: 7191 - recommended






Hi Doug:
RFC 2119 defines Recommended as equivalent to Should.
I'm wondering if changing all occurrences of Recommended to Should.would 
be clearer for American speakers?
All the best, Ashok


Doug Davis wrote:
>
> Doing 7191 (transfer 2119 terms) I came across some uses of 
> 'recommended' in the security section that seems clear to be real uses 
> of 2119 terms so I made them upper case.  Again - if this is an issue 
> let me know.
>
> thanks
> -Doug
> ______________________________________________________
> STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
> (919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
> The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.