- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:41:52 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- cc: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Doug Davis wrote:
> I wouldn't describe the situation the same way. I don't believe the
> proposal suggests that people keep 'A' - rather it simply offers it as
> an option for those who do not wish to change their code. If I were
> starting from scratch with my implementation I would much prefer to have
> a single way of expressing how/where to send messages, not two. That's
> the more interoperable solution.
Yes, clearly having one way of doing thing is a better recipe for interop,
hence my question :)
> As for "keeping A" - let's not forget that "A" is broken. People are
> free to continue to use it as they do today, as long as they understand
> the limitations. But WS-E itself should promote a solution that isn't
> broken and is consistent with the rest of the WS-* stack.
Well, to me, anything using EPRs is broken ;) brokenness is relative.
--
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
~~Yves
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 19:42:00 UTC