W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > April 2009

Re: [issue 6432] - a modest proposal

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:44:31 -0400 (EDT)
To: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
cc: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0904140541570.29151@ubzre.j3.bet>
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Doug Davis wrote:

> Yves,
>  Actually, what you describe is what we have now.  We have two different
> ways of
> expressing how/where to send a message(s) within the same spec.  We're
> moving
> towards one way.  And, in doing so we're moving towards having it be
> consistent with
> all other WS-* specs.  Code reuse!  No specialized "message sending" code
> needed
> just for WS-Eventing.  That's even better for interoperability.

I am not talking about the quality of the solutions here. My point was 
that we currently have solution 'A' in Eventing, and the possibility of 
using solution 'B' using a mU trick. You propose to add in Eventing 
solution 'B' but keep 'A' and just add a mU to 'A'.
Regardless of what are 'A' and 'B', I see absolutely no gain wrt 
interoperability. We still have two different solutions that won't 

Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 09:44:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:34:48 UTC