W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > April 2009

Re: [issue 6432] - a modest proposal

From: Bob Freund <bob@freunds.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:57:55 -0400
Cc: Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>, Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>, "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
Message-Id: <D1DC328D-C30E-4F09-A326-835A9D809862@freunds.com>
To: David Snelling <David.Snelling@UK.Fujitsu.com>

    <NotifyTo .../>
    <Format .../>
    <EndTo .../>
    <Expires .../>
    <Filter .../>

would do it for me.
then if dome spec choses to insert a <someNS:whatever>...</ 
and include a mU for their extension, it could be extended any way  
they wish.

The argument supporting inclusion of a <Delivery>...</Delivery> might  
make it palatable for folks who might want that element to be in the  
wes namespace, but in since most of the stuff contained in that  
element will be in their own namespace, I think it is better to omit  
it so that Delivery clearly is in the namespace of the extender


Received on Thursday, 9 April 2009 15:58:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:34:48 UTC