W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > April 2009

Re: issue 6432 - yet another proposal

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 05:34:27 -0400 (EDT)
To: Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>
cc: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>, Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>, "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0904080526440.2631@ubzre.j3.bet>
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Gilbert Pilz wrote:

> WS-Addressing 1.0 - Core defines two "special" URIs;
> "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous" and
> "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/none". Messages targeted to either
> of these URIs are processed differently from messages targeted to
> "normal" URIs such as "http://webserivce.bea.com/. . .".

Well, they are different, but unless you know WS-Addressing, or unless you 
resolve http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous and find out the 
relationship between this URI and the WS-Addressing spec.
If you resolve http://webservice.bea.com/... you will probably have 
information about the endpoint, or you may know it in advance from another 
document. So both URIs are opaque, unless you know their semantic.

Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 09:34:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:34:48 UTC