W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > April 2009

Re: issue 6432 - yet another proposal

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 05:34:27 -0400 (EDT)
To: Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>
cc: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>, Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>, "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0904080526440.2631@ubzre.j3.bet>
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Gilbert Pilz wrote:

> WS-Addressing 1.0 - Core defines two "special" URIs;
> "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous" and
> "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/none". Messages targeted to either
> of these URIs are processed differently from messages targeted to
> "normal" URIs such as "http://webserivce.bea.com/. . .".

Well, they are different, but unless you know WS-Addressing, or unless you 
resolve http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous and find out the 
relationship between this URI and the WS-Addressing spec.
If you resolve http://webservice.bea.com/... you will probably have 
information about the endpoint, or you may know it in advance from another 
document. So both URIs are opaque, unless you know their semantic.


-- 
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

         ~~Yves
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 09:34:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:17:54 GMT