W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org > March 2010

[Bug 9321] EVD: Should qname be optional?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:55:45 +0000
To: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1NwhXN-0006KW-1T@wiggum.w3.org>

David Snelling <david.Snelling@UK.Fujitsu.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |david.Snelling@UK.Fujitsu.co
                   |                            |m

--- Comment #1 from David Snelling <david.Snelling@UK.Fujitsu.com>  2010-03-30 19:55:44 ---
My concern is this:

This means that implementations MUST understand the action URI's at the
application level, just incase the body is empty. I have no real objection, but
we should make sure of the ramifications.

This might also imply some "MUSTs" on the receiver to deal with the options.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 30 March 2010 19:55:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:06:38 UTC