W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org > September 2009

[Bug 6533] Transfer: Safeness of operations

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:04:01 +0000
To: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Mizo1-0008Jz-K5@wiggum.w3.org>

--- Comment #8 from Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>  2009-09-03 00:04:01 ---
> Yves,
>  For the one operation in each spec that has been deemed 'safe', I was
> thinking of just adding this text after the definition of the operation:
> This operation will not result in any side effect imputable to the
> requester. This means that in case of an underlying protocol error that
> might get unnoticed, resending the same request can be done automatically.
> Does this work for you?

Yes, with a minor modification, can we say "This operation is safe; It 
will not result in..." ?
(ie: I'd like to keep the 'safe' in the text somewhere)

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 3 September 2009 00:04:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:06:35 UTC