http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8159 --- Comment #1 from Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com> 2009-12-08 13:41:19 --- Thinking more about this.... I think option 1 is probably the better choice. If we're worried about the size of the msg (for a small processor) then we should take into account that the processor might be forced to put the entire "application data" part of the message into memory at once and that would be the <Items> element and its children - option 1. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Tuesday, 8 December 2009 13:41:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 December 2009 13:41:21 GMT