W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org > August 2009

[Bug 6694] All: Which specifications have implicit operations?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:24:55 +0000
To: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1MgvpP-0000ti-Bx@wiggum.w3.org>

--- Comment #4 from David Snelling <david.Snelling@UK.Fujitsu.com>  2009-08-28 07:24:55 ---
Asir, Doug, and Dave have come up with the following language. It is less
proscriptive than my last pass, but makes it clear what implicit ops are and
how that affects what people see.

"An endpoint MAY indicate that it supports WS-Eventing, or any of its features,
by including the WS-Eventing Policy assertion(s) within its WSDL.  By doing so
the endpoint is indicating that the corresponding WS-Eventing operations will
be supported by that endpoint since they will not appear in the WSDL. "

Clearly the spec name needs to be changed for different specs.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 28 August 2009 07:25:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:06:35 UTC