W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access-comments@w3.org > May 2010

Re: Combined specification for xpath dialects

From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 01:07:22 +0200
To: <bob@freunds.com>
CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <public-ws-resource-access-comments@w3.org>, <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5F208A10-5927-4794-8D5A-E3CB410C764E@nokia.com>

The XML Security WG discussed the WS-RA approach on our teleconference last week (25 May 2010) and resolved the following [1]:

RESOLUTION: We agree with WS-RA's decision.

Thanks for considering our concern and letting us know of the WS-RA Working Group decision. In our opinion WS-RA issue Nr 9588 can be closed.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
Chair XML Security WG

[1] http://www.w3.org/2010/05/25-xmlsec-minutes.html

On May 12, 2010, at 9:03 AM, ext Bob Freund wrote:

> Dear Frederick,
> Your proposal and comment, which was recorded as Bugzilla Issue Nr. 9588, was discussed and resolved at the WS-RA Working group meeting of 2010-05-11.
> After consideration of your proposal as well as the proposal of an additional xpath dialect from another group, the WG decided that it wasn't in the business of defining xpath dialects at all.
> Consequently it has removed the definition of its "Xpath Level 1" dialect from the ws-fragmant specification and is closing both this issue and the other received requesting an additional xpath dialect with no action.  These individual dialects seem to have specific domain based requirements and as such did not seem appropriate for insertion in these specifications.
> Please respond to the list copied in this email indicating your agreement or disagreement with this approach.
> thanks
> -bob
Received on Monday, 31 May 2010 23:08:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:40:12 UTC