- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:34:56 +0900
- To: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- CC: public-ws-policy@w3.org, W3C WS-Policy Editors <public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org>
Felix Sasaki さんは書きました: > > Hello Frederick, > > just FYI: > > Frederick Hirsch さんは書きました: >> Attached are an update to the Framework Errata document, and a new >> Primer Errata document. >> >> This message is requesting the chairs and WG for formal WG approval >> of these documents and publication. >> >> Once approved they can be checked into CVS [1]. This will update the >> content referenced from the Framework Recommendation [2] to the >> Framework Errata, making the Framework errata visible. >> >> The Primer Note does not have a link to the errata. I recommend that >> the WS-Policy WG home page [3] be updated with a link to the Errata >> document for the Primer. > > From the W3C process you can have an errata document only for > Recommendations. However, if the WG is fine to maintain a document > like what your propose, that's fine. You just have to be aware of the > informal status of that document. > >> >> Separately I ask whether we might also update the note to include a >> link to the primer errata document. > > I'm not sure if that is OK - to publish a WG Note with a link to an > errata document. I'll check and come back to you. I checked, it's OK to publish a new version of the Note that links to the errata document. Meanwhile, if there are primer errata, you may take the opportunity to integrate them. Felix > > Felix > >> >> Thanks to Asir for reviewing drafts of the errata documents. >> >> regards, Frederick >> >> Frederick Hirsch >> Nokia >> >> [1] they would both be checked into the directory >> WWW/2002/ws/policy/7 in /w3ccvs >> >> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/ >> >> [3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/ , Add errata link next to entry >> in bullet list for primer >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> W3C <http://www.w3.org/> >> >> >> Web Services Policy 1.5 - Framework Errata >> >> >> 21 November 2008 >> >> Latest version: >> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/7/framework-errata.html Editors: >> Asir S Vedamuthu, Microsoft Corporation >> David Orchard, BEA Systems, Inc. >> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia >> Maryann Hondo, IBM Corporation >> Prasad Yendluri, webMethods (A subsidiary of Software AG) >> Toufic Boubez, Layer 7 Technologies >> Ümit Yalçinalp, SAP AG. >> >> Last modified: $Date: 2007/09/25 03:43:31 $ >> >> Copyright <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Copyright> >> (©) 2007 W3C <http://www.w3.org/>^® (MIT <http://www.csail.mit.edu/>, >> ERCIM <http://www.ercim.org/>, Keio <http://www.keio.ac.jp/>), All >> Rights Reserved. W3C liability >> <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Legal_Disclaimer>, >> trademark >> <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#W3C_Trademarks> and >> document use <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-documents> >> rules apply. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> Abstract >> >> This document records all known errors in the Web Services Policy 1.5 >> - Framework <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/> >> specification; for updates see the latest version of that document. >> >> The errata are numbered, classified as Substantive <#substantive> or >> Editorial <#editorial>, and listed in reverse chronological order of >> their date of publication in each category. >> >> Each entry has the following information: >> >> * A unique entry number >> * The date it was added to the errata page. >> * The section referred to. >> * A description of the problem and correction if applicable. >> Changes to the text of the spec are indicated thus: deleted >> text, new text, modified text . >> * A rationale for making the change (not required for editorial >> errata). >> >> Changes to the text of the specification are indicated thus: new, >> added text, modified text, and deleted text. Substantive corrections >> are proposed by the Web Services Policy Working Group >> <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/> (part of the Web Services >> Activity <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/>), which has consensus that they >> are appropriate; they are not to be considered normative until >> approved by a Call for Review of Proposed Corrections >> <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/tr.html#cfr-corrections> >> or a Call for Review of an Edited Recommendation >> <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/tr.html#cfr-edited>. >> >> The Working Group is tracking all comments via Bugzilla >> <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=WS-Policy&component=Framework&component=Framework%2BAttachment&component=Framework%2BAttachment%2BGuidelines&component=Framework%2BAttachment%2BPrimer> >> and highly prefers to receive comments via this system. If access to >> Bugzilla is not feasible, you may send your comments to the mailing >> list public-ws-policy-comments@w3.org >> <mailto:public-ws-policy-comments@w3.org> mailing list (public >> archive >> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy-comments/>). >> Each Bugzilla entry and email message should contain only one >> comment. All comments on this specification should be made following >> the Description for Issues <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/#issues> >> of the Working Group. It will be very helpful if you include the >> string [WS-Policy-errata] in the subject line of your comment. >> >> >> Status of this Document >> >> This document records all known errors in the Web Services Policy 1.5 >> - Framework <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/> >> specification; that were known at the time of publication of this >> document. >> >> None of the errata reported in this document have been approved by a >> Call for Review of Proposed Corrections or a Call for Review of an >> Edited Recommendation. As a consequence, they must not be considered >> to be normative. >> >> >> Table of Contents >> >> 1 Substantive Errata <#substantive> >> 2 Editorial Errata <#editorial> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> 1 Substantive Errata >> >> No substantive errata at present >> >> >> 2 Editorial Errata >> >> >> E01 >> >> Date Added: 2008-11-21 >> >> Summary: Note on using xml:id should reference Canonical XML 1.1 and >> XML Signature, Second Edition. References should be updated. >> >> >> Section *4.2, Policy Identification* >> >> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/#Policy_Identification> >> >> >> 1. >> >> Replace the text of the second Note >> >> *Note:* >> Canonical XML 1.1 [C14N11 >> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/#C14N11>] >> is intended to address the issues that occur with Canonical >> XML 1.0 with regards to xml:id. The W3C XML Security >> Specifications Maintenance WG has been chartered to address >> how to integrate Canonical XML 1.1 with XML Security, >> including XML Signature [SecSpecMaintWG >> >> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/#SecSpecMaintWG>] >> (See http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/.) >> with the following text: >> >> *Note:* >> Note that is acceptable to sign a policy expression >> identified using xml:id with XML SIgnature (Second Edition) >> [XML-Signature-2ndEdition] and Canonical XML 1.1 [C14N11], >> as these recommendations address issues related to the use >> of xml:id and xml:base. >> where XML-Signature-2ndEdition is a link to a new reference >> added to the document. >> >> >> Appendix *B.2 Other References* >> >> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/#Informative-References> >> >> >> 1. >> >> Update the reference to C14N11, as follows: >> >> Canonical XML 1.1, J. Boyer and G. Marcy Authors. W3C >> Candidate Recommendation, 21 June 2007. This is a work in >> progress. This version is available at >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/CR-xml-c14n11-20070621.2 May 2008. >> This version is available at >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-c14n11-20080502. The >> latest version of Canonical XML 1.1 is available at >> http://www.w3.org/TR//xml-c14n11/. >> 2. >> >> Add a reference to XML Signature (Second Edition) after the >> reference to [XMLSignature]: >> >> [XML-Signature-2ndEdition] XML Signature Syntax and >> Processing, D. Eastlake, J. Reagle, D. Solo, F. Hirsch, and >> T. Roessler Editors. W3C Recommendation, 10 June 2008. This >> version of the XML Signature Syntax and Processing >> Recommendation is >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xmldsig-core-20080610/. The >> latest version of XML-Signature Syntax and Processing is >> available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/. >> XML-Signature-2ndEdition is a link target. Note the removal of >> the hyphen in the title of the Second Edition. >> >> 3. >> >> Remove reference to XML Security Specifications Maintenance >> Working Group, [SecSpecMaintWG], as the text that referenced it >> has been removed as part of E01: >> >> [SecSpecMaintWG] XML Security Specifications Maintenance >> Working Group , See http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> W3C <http://www.w3.org/> >> >> >> Web Services Policy 1.5 - Primer Errata >> >> >> 21 November 2008 >> >> Latest version: >> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/7/primer-errata.html Editors: >> Asir S Vedamuthu, Microsoft Corporation >> David Orchard, BEA Systems, Inc. >> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia >> Maryann Hondo, IBM Corporation >> Prasad Yendluri, webMethods (A subsidiary of Software AG) >> Toufic Boubez, Layer 7 Technologies >> Ümit Yalçinalp, SAP AG. >> >> Last modified: $Date: 2007/09/25 03:43:31 $ >> >> Copyright <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Copyright> >> (©) 2007 W3C <http://www.w3.org/>^® (MIT <http://www.csail.mit.edu/>, >> ERCIM <http://www.ercim.org/>, Keio <http://www.keio.ac.jp/>), All >> Rights Reserved. W3C liability >> <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Legal_Disclaimer>, >> trademark >> <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#W3C_Trademarks> and >> document use <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-documents> >> rules apply. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> Abstract >> >> This document records all known errors in the Web Services Policy 1.5 >> - Primer <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-ws-policy-primer-20071112/> >> Working Group Note ; for updates see the latest version of that >> document. >> >> The errata are numbered, classified as Substantive <#substantive> or >> Editorial <#editorial>, and listed in reverse chronological order of >> their date of publication in each category. >> >> Each entry has the following information: >> >> * A unique entry number >> * The date it was added to the errata page. >> * The section referred to. >> * A description of the problem and correction if applicable. >> Changes to the text of the spec are indicated thus: deleted >> text, new text, modified text . >> * A rationale for making the change (not required for editorial >> errata). >> >> Changes to the text of the specification are indicated thus: new, >> added text, modified text, and deleted text. >> >> The Working Group is tracking all comments via Bugzilla >> <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=WS-Policy&component=Framework&component=Framework%2BAttachment&component=Framework%2BAttachment%2BGuidelines&component=Framework%2BAttachment%2BPrimer> >> and highly prefers to receive comments via this system. If access to >> Bugzilla is not feasible, you may send your comments to the mailing >> list public-ws-policy-comments@w3.org >> <mailto:public-ws-policy-comments@w3.org> mailing list (public >> archive >> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy-comments/>). >> Each Bugzilla entry and email message should contain only one >> comment. All comments on this specification should be made following >> the Description for Issues <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/#issues> >> of the Working Group. It will be very helpful if you include the >> string [WS-Policy-errata] in the subject line of your comment. >> >> >> Status of this Document >> >> This document records all known errors in the Web Services Policy 1.5 >> - Primer <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-ws-policy-primer-20071112/> >> Working Group Note that were known at the time of publication of this >> document. >> >> >> Table of Contents >> >> 1 Substantive Errata <#substantive> >> 2 Editorial Errata <#editorial> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> 1 Substantive Errata >> >> No substantive errata at present >> >> >> 2 Editorial Errata >> >> >> E01 >> >> Date Added: 2008-11-21 >> >> Summary: Note on using xml:id should reference Canonical XML 1.1 and >> XML Signature, Second Edition. References should be updated. >> >> >> Section *2.10 Referencing Policy Expressions* >> >> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-ws-policy-primer-20071112/#Referencing_Policy_Expressions> >> >> >> 1. >> >> Replace the text of the Note >> >> *Note:* >> Canonical XML 1.1 [C14N11 >> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/#C14N11>] >> is intended to address the issues that occur with Canonical >> XML 1.0 with regards to xml:id. The W3C XML Security >> Specifications Maintenance WG has been chartered to address >> how to integrate Canonical XML 1.1 with XML Security, >> including XML Signature [SecSpecMaintWG >> >> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/#SecSpecMaintWG>] >> (See http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/.) >> with the following text: >> >> *Note:* >> Note that is acceptable to sign a policy expression >> identified using xml:id with XML SIgnature (Second Edition) >> [XML-Signature-2ndEdition] and Canonical XML 1.1 [C14N11], >> as these recommendations address issues related to the use >> of xml:id and xml:base. >> where XML-Signature-2ndEdition is a link to a new reference >> added to the document. >> >> >> Appendix *C References* >> >> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-ws-policy-primer-20071112/#references> >> >> 1. >> >> Update the reference to C14N11, as follows: >> >> Canonical XML 1.1, J. Boyer and G. Marcy Authors. W3C >> Candidate Recommendation, 21 June 2007. This is a work in >> progress. This version is available at >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/CR-xml-c14n11-20070621.2 May 2008. >> This version is available at >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-c14n11-20080502. The >> latest version of Canonical XML 1.1 is available at >> http://www.w3.org/TR//xml-c14n11/. >> 2. >> >> Add a reference to XML Signature (Second Edition) after the >> reference to [C14N11]: >> >> [XML-Signature-2ndEdition] XML Signature Syntax and >> Processing, D. Eastlake, J. Reagle, D. Solo, F. Hirsch, and >> T. Roessler Editors. W3C Recommendation, 10 June 2008. This >> version of the XML Signature Syntax and Processing >> Recommendation is >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xmldsig-core-20080610/. The >> latest version of XML-Signature Syntax and Processing is >> available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/. >> XML-Signature-2ndEdition is a link target. Note the removal of >> the hyphen in the title of the Second Edition. >> >> 3. >> >> Remove reference to XML Security Specifications Maintenance >> Working Group, [SecSpecMaintWG], as the text that referenced it >> has been removed as part of E01: >> >> [SecSpecMaintWG] XML Security Specifications Maintenance >> Working Group , See http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec. >> > > >
Received on Saturday, 22 November 2008 05:35:40 UTC