Re: Changes between Ws-Policy 1.2 and 1.5

Thanks, Paul!
One addition: we added some words re. ordering of assertions.

All the best, Ashok


Paul Cotton wrote:
>
> A list of substantive changes in Web Services Policy - Framework 1.5 
> [1] and Web Services Policy - Attachment 1.5 [2] since the WS-Policy 
> Member Submission (1.2) [3] is given below. WG members are asked to 
> comment on this list if they feel it is incorrect.
>
> Framework
>
> 1) Added support for the xml:id attribute (see 4.2 Policy 
> Identification [4]).
>
> 2) Added a conformance section – 6. Conformance [5].
>
> 3) Replaced URI with IRI.
>
> 4) Enhanced 5. Security Considerations [6] (new content is from the 
> Security Considerations Section in the Understanding WS-Policy [7] 
> MSDN white paper).
>
> 5) Clarified that an unrecognized element within a policy expression 
> MUST be an assertion (see 2.2 Extensibility [8]).
>
> 6) Clarified that policy assertion parameters are opaque to framework 
> processing (see 4.3.2 Policy Assertion Nesting [9]).
>
> 7) Added element extensibility (via {Any}) to the PolicyReference 
> element (see 4.3.4 Policy References [10]).
>
> 8) Added a new feature: 4.4 Ignorable Policy Assertions [11].
>
> 9) Defined an XML Media Type to describe Web Service Policy documents 
> serialized as XML in Appendix A. The application/wspolicy+xml Media 
> Type [12].
>
> Attachment
>
> 1) Added a conformance section – 8. Conformance [13].
>
> 2) Replaced URI with IRI.
>
> 3) Added a new section - 5. WS-Policy Attachment for WSDL 2.0 [14] - 
> that describes a mechanism for associating policy expressions with Web 
> service constructs in WSDL 2.0.
>
> 4) Added a new domain expression: 3.4.1 URI Domain Expression [15].
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/
>
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-attach-20070904/
>
> [3] http://www.w3.org/Submission/2006/06/
>
> [4] 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/#Policy_Identification
>
> [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/#Conformance
>
> [6] 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/#Security_Considerations
>
> [7] http://msdn.microsoft.com/ws/2006/07/understanding-ws-policy/
>
> [8] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/#Extensibility
>
> [9] 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/#Policy_Assertion_Nesting
>
> [10] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/#Policy_References
>
> [11] 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/#ignorable-policy-assertions
>
> [12] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-20070904/#media-type
>
> [13] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-attach-20070904/#Conformance
>
> [14] 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-attach-20070904/#ws-policy-attachment-for-wsdl20
>
> [15] 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-ws-policy-attach-20070904/#uri-domain-expression
>
> I hope this helps.
>
> /paulc
>
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
>
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
>
> Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of ashok malhotra
> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 11:46 AM
> To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
> Subject: Changes between Ws-Policy 1.2 and 1.5
>
> Is there an official log of the changes between WS-Policy 1.2 and 1.5?
>
> --
>
> All the best, Ashok
>

Received on Thursday, 15 May 2008 12:24:58 UTC