W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > March 2007

Re: [VER3] Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F meeting 32 - 2007-03-13 to 2007-03-15

From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:22:53 -0400
To: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
Cc: public-ws-policy@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF97796AA5.D9C11B2E-ON8525729E.006970CB-8525729E.006A662A@us.ibm.com>
The F2F participants have resolved all of the agenda items that can be 
resolved. Thus, we have chosen
to adjourn the F2F meeting as of the lunch break.

Our host has agreed to accomodate the continued interop testing through 
the end of the regularly scheduled
meeting time (e.g. though tomorrow, including b'fast and lunch)

The WG will not meet on Thursday. WG members encouraged to work on action 
items and proposals for
closing their issues, etc.

Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris
phone: +1 508 377 9295

public-ws-policy-request@w3.org wrote on 03/13/2007 08:22:59 PM:

> 
> Updated for Wednesday to reflect deferred issues, etc. 
> 
> Wednesday 14 March, 2007 - 9:00 am PDT - 5:00 pm PDT 
> 
> 1. Interop prelim report, Jonathan Marsh (9:00 am PDT) 
> 
> 2. Deferred items (9:10 am PDT) 
> a. [NEW ISSUE] 4292 Intersection mode is neither defaulted nor specified 

> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4292 
> Status: Charlton has a proposal to share... email TBD 
> 
> b) Issue 4262: Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorable on t... 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4262 
> See Monica's recent email: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0061.html 
> 
> Created ACTION-247 - Propose resolution to 4262, Monica to help [on 
> Prasad Yendluri - due 2007-03-14]. 
> Status: Monica and Prasad working on revised proposal... email TBD 
> 
> c) WSDL11 identifiers decision to publish new WD 
> 
> 3. Guidelines issues, Part 4 (9:40 am PDT) 
> 
> a) ISSUE 3987: Section 5.9 - Lifecycle of Assertions?, Asir 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3987 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0111.html 
> Status: Maryann and Asir to draft proposal... email TBD 
> 
> b) ISSUE 4072: Statements not relevant to assertion design, Dan 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4072 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0046.html 
> Fabian's response: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0063.html 
> 
> c) ISSUE 3978: Clarify if Section 7 on defining new policy 
> attachment mechanisms is necessary, Dan Roth 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3978 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0102.html 
> Maryann's response: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0131.html 
> 
> d) ISSUE 3989: Suggested format for the Guidelines document., Asir 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3989 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0113.html 
> Maryann's response: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0132.html 
> Asir: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0139.html 
> Umit: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0141.html 
> Proposal from IBM/MSFT: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0069.html 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0071.html 
> 
> 4. Break (10:30 am PDT) 
> 
> 5. Guidelines issues, Part 5 (11:00 am PDT) 
> 
> a) ISSUE 3988: Section 8 doesn't illustrate how to design an assertion., 
Asir 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3988 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0112.html 
> Email discussion thread: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0000.html 
> 
> a) ISSUE 4074: [Guidelines] Collection of unclear Guidance or text 
> issues, Dan 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4074 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0053.html 
> 
> b) ISSUE 3981: What is the relevance of Section 4 'Authoring Styles'
> to policy assertion design?, Asir 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3981 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0107.html 
> Proposal from Umit: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0000.html 
> 
> c) ISSUE 3990: Content in Section 5.7 is unclear, Dan Roth http:
> //www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3990 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0114.html 
> 
> 6. Lunch (12:30 pm PDT) 
> 
> 4. Guidelines issues, Part 6 (1:30 pm PDT) 
> 
> a) [NEW ISSUE] 4198: Policy assertion semantics independent of 
> attachment mechanism 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4198 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jan/0083.html 
> ACTION-218 Umit and Maryann to provide text for subject attachment 
> Extensibility in guidelines 
> DONE.  See: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0057.html 
> 
> b) ACTION-192 Maryann give proposal for changes resulting from 4142 
> 2007-01-23 
> DONE 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0003.html 
> 
> c) ISSUE 4319: [Guidelines] (Editorial) WS-RMP reference should be 
> consistent with other references 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4319 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0059.html 
> 
> 7. Break (3:30 pm PDT) 
> 
> 8. AOB (4:00 pm PDT) 
> 
> 9. Recess (5:00 pm PDT) 
> 
> Christopher Ferris
> STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
> email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris
> phone: +1 508 377 9295 
> 
> __________________ 
> 
> 
> 1. added 4292 
> 2. added link to negative test case proposal 
> 3. added Prasad's new issue 
> 4. added proposal for 3989 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------ 
> 
> Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F meeting 32 - 2007-03-13 to 2007-03-15 
> 
> This meeting will be hosted by WedMethods in Sunnyvale, Ca F2F Chair 
will 
> http://www.w3.org/2007/03/ws-policy-f2f-logistics.html 
> 
> The phone number to use for the WS-Policy WG F2F is documented on 
> the WG's administrative home page: 
> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/admin#phone 
> 
> Participants are invited to join IRC channel #ws-policy as 
> documented on the WG's administrative home page. Please register with 
Zakim: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-policy/2006Aug/0012.html 
> 
> Tuesday 13 March, 2007 - 9:00 am PDT - 5:00 pm PDT 
> 
> 1. Roll call and selection of secretary, Chair (9:00 am PDT) 
> 
> a) Scribe List: 
> 
> Maryann Hondo (scribe Tue Mar 13 AM) 
> Dale Moberg (scribe Tue Mar 13 PM) 
> Monica Martin (scribe Wed Mar 14 AM) 
> Felix Sasaki (scribe Wed Mar 14 PM) 
> Asir Vedamuthu (scribe Thu Mar 15 AM) 
> Frederick Hirsch (scribe Thu Mar 15 PM) 
> Dimitar Angelov 
> Sanjiva Weerawarana 
> Ruchith Fernando 
> Tom Jordahl 
> Vladislav Bezrukov 
> ---------------------- 
> Symon Chang 
> Doug Davis 
> Jacques Durand 
> Steve Jones 
> Paul Knight 
> Mohammad Makarechian 
> Jonathan Marsh 
> Arnaud Meyniel 
> Sanjay Patil 
> Skip Snow 
> Mark Temple-Raston 
> Jeff Mischkinsky 
> Sanka Samaranayake 
> Yakov Sverdlov 
> Dale Moberg 
> Chris Ferris 
> Mark Little 
> Glen Daniels 
> William Henry 
> Toufic Boubez 
> Frederick Hirsch 
> Prasad Yendluri 
> Anthony Nadalin 
> Daniel Roth 
> Fabian Ritzmann 
> Sergey Beryozkin 
> Charlton Barreto 
> David Orchard 
> Ashok Malhotra 
> Abbie Barbir 
> 
> 
> b) Scribe FAQ (Updated) 
> Member only: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-policy/2006Oct/0001.html 
> 
> 2. Review and approval of telcon minutes, Chair (9:05 am PDT) 
> 
> a) Review and approval of 2007-03-07 minutes 
> Draft minutes: 
> http://www.w3.org/2007/03/07-ws-policy-minutes.html 
> Cleaned-up: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-
> policy/2007Mar/0019.html (member only) 
> 
> 3. Future WG meetings, Chair (9:10 am PDT) 
> 
> a) Future meetings 
> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/admin#meetings 
> Reminder: March 21 telcon is cancelled to allow members^^^^^^^chairs
> to recover from F2F 
> 
> c) Wed-Fri May 23-25 F2F meeting in Ottawa hosted by Nortel 
> http://www.w3.org/2007/05/ws-policy-f2f-logistics.html 
> 
> d) Tue-Thu Jul 17-19 F2F meeting in Dublin hosted by Iona 
> http://www.w3.org/2007/07/ws-policy-f2f-logistics.html 
> 
> 4. Editorial team report (9:15 am PDT) 
> Current Editors drafts: 
> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/#drafts 
> 
> a) WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers Editor's draft 
> http://dev.w3.
> org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/wsdl11elementidentifiers.html?
> content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8 
> Status: The WG will consider re-publication of a revised draft since
> there are no open issues remaining. 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0060.html 
> 
> 5. Review action items, Chair (9:20 am PDT) 
> Open action items: 
> Member only: 
> http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/open 
> 
> ACTION-234 Asir to provide format for recording interop results 
> Status: Work in progress and XML format for results will be 
> available on Fri Mar 9. 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0062.html 
> Follow-up from Chris: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0070.html 
> 
> ACTION-238 Paul and Chris to discuss how to collect and maintain 
> interop results (e.g. who does this) 
> Status: To be discussed at F2F. 
> 
> ACTION-241 Chris Ferris to prepare test cases for feature 43 - 
> Negative testing 
> Status: Done 
> See email from Chris: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-
> policy/2007Mar/0068.html 
> 
> ACTION-243 Asir to produce a list of change areas in the framework 
> and attachments primer and guidelines specs related to a change in 
> the reference to the oasis ws-sec policy spec to reference the 
> latest available published committee draft 
> Status: TBD after the F2F. 
> 
> ACTION-246         Propose resolution for 4213 (example for 
> ignorable)         Maryann Hondo         2007-03-14 
> 
> ACTION-247         Propose resolution to 4262, Monica to help 
> Prasad Yendluri         2007-03-14 
> 
> ACTION-248  start e-mails on 4300         David Orchard 2007-03-14 
> 
> ACTION-249         Create a seperate interop mailing list (public-
> ws-policy-interop@w3.org)         Felix Sasaki         2007-03-14 
> Done: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-policy/2007Mar/0020.html
> (member only) 
> 
> 6. WS-Policy Call for Implementations, Chair (9:30 am PDT) 
> 
> a) Published endpoints available: 
> Microsoft: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0171.html 
> IBM: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0172.html 
> webMethods: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-policy/2007Mar/0024.html 
> Layer7: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-policy/2007Mar/0023.html 
> WSO2: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-policy/2007Mar/0022.html 
> Note: we expect to maintain this on the interop status page being 
> prepared by Asir 
> see Action-234 
> 
> b) Discussion of interop infrastructure and setup requirements 
> 
> ACTION-249 - Create a seperate interop list [on Felix Sasaki - due 
> 2007-03-14]. 
> DONE: Done: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-
> policy/2007Mar/0020.html (member only) 
> 
> c) ACTION-234 Asir to provide format for recording interop results 
> Status: Work in progress and XML format for results will be 
> available on Fri Mar 9. 
> 
> d) Editor's questions about interop scenarios 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0037.html 
> See also Issue 4311: 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4311 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0035.html 
> 
> 7. CR Issues (10:00 am PDT) 
> 
> a. [NEW ISSUE] 4379 Note about c14n 1.1 , Felix 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0051.html 
> 
> b. [NEW ISSUE] 4292 Intersection mode is neither defaulted nor specified 

> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4292 
> 
> c. [NEW ISSUE] 4292 WS-Policy 1.5 Attachment UDDI tModel keys and 
> related references 
> outdated, Prasad 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0067.html 
> 
> 8. Adoption of CR test cases (10:10 am PDT) 
> 
> a) Feature 22 test cases, Ashok 
> 
> ACTION-240 Ashok to provide feature 22 (wsdl2.0) test cases using 
> wsdl2.0 documents in the round 3 scenarios 
> DONE. See: 
> Testcases for External Attachment WSDL 1.1 and 2.0, Ashok 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0020.html 
> Status: Ashok is working a revision for the F2F meeting. 
> 
> b) Feature 23, Ashok 
> ACTION-242 Ashok to provide expected outcome docs for Feature 23 test 
cases 
> Status: Pending. 
> 
> c) Feature 43, negative test cases, Chris 
> 
> ACTION-241 Chris Ferris to prepare test cases for feature 43 - 
> Negative testing 
> http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/241 
> Status: Chris is working on a test case for the F2F with some a wsp:
> name that is invalid operator. 
> 
> d) test suite issue 4370: Round 2 WSDL 1.1 input file contains 
> invalid references 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0030.html 
> Asir response: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0031.html 
> Status: Fabian asked for more time to review the proposed changes. 
> 
> e) Other CR test cases issues 
> 
> 9. Break (10:30 am PDT) 
> 
> 10. Liaison items (11:00 am PDT) 
> 
> a) Feedback to WS-Addressing WG on Web Services Addressing 1.0 - 
> Metadata specification 
> Email to WS-A WG: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0153.html 
> 
> Consolidated list of Alternatives A thru D to resolved WS ADDR LC 
comment 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0027.html 
> Note: I am not proposing we discuss this at this meeting.  This is 
> being processed by the WS-Addressing WG. 
> 
> a) WS-Addressing Metadata issues: 4374, 4375, and 4376 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0044.html 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0045.html 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0046.html 
> 
> 10. Issues requiring proposals for F2F meeting, Paul C (11:05 am PDT) 
> 
> a) Issue 4213: Use of empty policy for nesting should be exemplified 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jan/0100.html 
> 
> ACTION-246 - Propose resolution for 4213 (example for ignorable) [on
> Maryann Hondo - due 2007-03-14]. 
> 
> b) Issue 4262: Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorable on t... 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4262 
> See Monica's recent email: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0061.html 
> 
> Created ACTION-247 - Propose resolution to 4262, Monica to help [on 
> Prasad Yendluri - due 2007-03-14]. 
> 
> c) Issue 4300 - Misue of best practises in primer, Umit 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4300 
> 
> Created ACTION-248 - Orchard start e-mails on 4300 [on David Orchard
> - due 2007-03-14]. 
> 
> 11. Primer issues (11:30 am PDT) 
> 
> a) Issue 4103 - Questionable use of Contoso Ltd in Primer, Chris Ferris 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4103 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0077.html 
> See thread ending at: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0102.html 
> Status: Asir has action 183 
> 
> ACTION-183 OPEN Research ownership of "Contoso" name/trademark. Asir
> Vedamuthu 2007-01-10 
> See email from Chris Ferris: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0033.html 
> 
> b) Issue 4339 - Update references to interoperability in Ignorable 
> Policy Expressions 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4339 
> 
> c) Issue 4263 - Add text to ignorable discussion on passing ignorable 
> Updated proposal from Monica: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0013.html 
> Email discussion: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0012.html 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0011.html 
> Recent thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-
> policy/2007Feb/0165.html 
> 
> d) Issue 4253 - [Primer] Basic Concepts section on Policy does not 
> explain usage reasonably 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4253 
> 
> ACTION-201 William Henry to a concrete proposal for 4255 and 4253 
> DONE.  See: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0078.html 
> See recent thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-
> policy/2007Mar/0048.html 
> 
> e) Issue 4255 - Section 2.9 should also explain basic attaching 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4255 
> 
> ACTION-201 William Henry to a concrete proposal for 4255 and 4253 
> DONE.  See: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0076.html 
> See recent thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-
> policy/2007Mar/0048.html 
> 
> f) Issue 4288 - Primer: Absence of Policy Assertions (editorial), Monica 

> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jan/0214.html 
> ACTION-217  Maryann and Monica to amend issue 4288 
> DONE: 
> Proposal from Monica: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0014.html 
> Recent thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-
> policy/2007Feb/0151.html 
> Friendly Amendment from Maryann: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0047.html
> 
> 12. Lunch (12:30 pm PDT) 
> 
> 13. Guidelines issues, Part 1 (1:30 pm PDT) 
> 
> a) Issue 4035 and 4040 
> 
> ISSUE 4035: [Guidelines] Section 2 should account for interop impact
> of non-wire or one-party assertions and ignorable property 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4035 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0007.html 
> recent thread: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0169.html 
> 
> ISSUE 4040: [Guidelines] Update guidelines to include discussion of 
> ignorable, Frederick 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4040 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0025.html 
> 
> 13. Guidelines issues, Part 2 (2:00 pm PDT) 
> 
> a) ISSUE 3987: Section 5.9 - Lifecycle of Assertions?, Asir 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3987 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0111.html 
> 
> b) ISSUE 4035: [ Guidelines] Section 2 should account for interop 
> impact of non-wire or one-party assertions and ignorable property 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4035 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0007.html 
> 
> c) ISSUE 4072: Statements not relevant to assertion design, Dan 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4072 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0046.html 
> Fabian's response: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0063.html 
> 
> d) ISSUE 3979: Clarify the guidance in section 5.9.1 on referencing 
> policy expressions, Dan Roth 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3979 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0104.html 
> Recent thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-
> policy/2007Feb/0167.html 
> 
> ACTION-164 Try to write up alternative text that takes into 
> consideration today\\'s discussion on issue 3979 DONE. See: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0071.html 
> amended by:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-
> policy/2007Feb/0167.html 
> 
> e) ISSUE 4073: Free standing statements, Asir 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4073 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0049.html 
> 
> f) ISSUE 4074: Collection of unclear Guidance or text issues, Dan 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4074 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0053.html 
> See exchange between Dan and Umit at: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0085.html 
> 
> 14. Break (3:30 pm PDT) 
> 
> 15. Guidelines issues, Part 3 (4:00 pm PDT) 
> 
> a) ISSUE 3978: Clarify if Section 7 on defining new policy 
> attachment mechanisms is necessary, Dan Roth 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3978 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0102.html 
> Maryann's response: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0131.html 
> 
> b) ISSUE 3989: Suggested format for the Guidelines document., Asir 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3989 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0113.html 
> Maryann's response: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0132.html 
> Asir: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0139.html 
> Umit: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0141.html 
> Proposal from IBM/MSFT: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0069.html 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0071.html 
> 
> c) ISSUE 3988: Section 8 doesn't illustrate how to design an assertion., 
Asir
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3988 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0112.html 
> Email discussion thread: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0000.html 
> 
> 16. Recess (5:00 pm PDT) 
> 
> Wednesday 14 March, 2007 - 9:00 am PDT - 5:00 pm PDT 
> 
> 1. Interop prelim report, Jonathan Marsh (9:00 am PDT) 
> 
> 2. Deferred items (9:10 am PDT) 
> a. [NEW ISSUE] 4292 Intersection mode is neither defaulted nor specified 

> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4292 
> Status: Charlton has a proposal to share... email TBD 
> 
> b) Issue 4262: Use of @wsp:optional and @wsp:Ignorable on t... 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4262 
> See Monica's recent email: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0061.html 
> 
> Created ACTION-247 - Propose resolution to 4262, Monica to help [on 
> Prasad Yendluri - due 2007-03-14]. 
> Status: Monica and Prasad working on revised proposal... email TBD 
> 
> c) WSDL11 identifiers decision to publish new WD 
> 
> 2. Guidelines issues, Part 4 (9:10 am PDT) 
> 
> d) ISSUE 3987: Section 5.9 - Lifecycle of Assertions?, Asir 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3987 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0111.html 
> Status: Maryann and Asir to draft proposal... email TBD 
> 
> a) ISSUE 4072: Statements not relevant to assertion design, Dan 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4072 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0046.html 
> Fabian's response: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0063.html 
> 
> a) ISSUE 4074: [Guidelines] Collection of unclear Guidance or text 
issues, Dan
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4074 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0053.html 
> 
> b) ISSUE 3981: What is the relevance of Section 4 'Authoring Styles'
> to policy assertion design?, Asir 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3981 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0107.html 
> Proposal from Umit: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0000.html 
> 
> c) ISSUE 3990: Content in Section 5.7 is unclear, Dan Roth http:
> //www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3990 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0114.html 
> 
> 3. Break (10:30 am PDT) 
> 
> 4. Guidelines issues, Part 4 (11:00 am PDT) 
> 
> a) [NEW ISSUE] 4198: Policy assertion semantics independent of 
> attachment mechanism 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4198 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jan/0083.html 
> ACTION-218 Umit and Maryann to provide text for subject attachment 
> Extensibility in guidelines 
> DONE.  See: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0057.html 
> 
> b) ACTION-192 Maryann give proposal for changes resulting from 4142 
2007-01-23
> DONE 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0003.html 
> 
> c) ISSUE 4319: [Guidelines] (Editorial) WS-RMP reference should be 
> consistent with other references 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4319 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0059.html 
> 
> 5. Lunch (12:30 pm PDT) 
> 
> 6. AOB (1:30 pm PDT) 
> 
> 7. Break (3:30 pm PDT) 
> 
> 8. AOB (4:00 pm PDT) 
> 
> 9. Recess (5:00 pm PDT) 
> 
> Thursday 15 March, 2007 9:00 am - 3:00 pm PDT 
> 
> 1. Interop report and feedback, Jonathan Marsh (9:00 am PDT) 
> 
> 2. Break (10:30 am PDT) 
> 
> 3. AOB 
> 
> 4. Lunch (12:30 pm PDT) 
> 
> 5. AOB (1:30 pm PDT) 
> 
> 6. Break (3:30 pm PDT) 
> 
> 7. AOB (4:00 pm PDT) 
> 
> 8. Recess (5:00 pm PDT) 
> 
> Christopher Ferris 
> STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy 
> email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com 
> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris 
> phone: +1 508 377 9295 
> 
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 
> Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 
> mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 19:23:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:48 GMT