W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > March 2007

RE: Testcases for External Attachment WSDL 1.1 and 2.0

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:42:22 -0800
Message-ID: <E16EB59B8AEDF445B644617E3C1B3C9C0359B45C@repbex01.amer.bea.com>
To: "Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, "Asir Vedamuthu" <asirveda@microsoft.com>, <public-ws-policy@w3.org>

These have been incorporated into the round 4 tests.  Much thanks.

In future, I suggest any changes be made as diffs rather than complete
submission.

Cheers,
Dave 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ashok Malhotra [mailto:ashok.malhotra@oracle.com] 
> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 5:13 AM
> To: David Orchard; Asir Vedamuthu; public-ws-policy@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Testcases for External Attachment WSDL 1.1 and 2.0
> 
> David:
> Revised testcases are attached.
> 
> Re. c) and d) I changed as requested.  If the typos were in 
> the WSDL 1.1 Identifiers document and not the testcases then 
> these would have to be fixed.
> 
> All the best, Ashok
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy- 
> > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Orchard
> > Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 5:51 PM
> > To: Asir Vedamuthu; Ashok Malhotra; public-ws-policy@w3.org
> > Subject: RE: Testcases for External Attachment WSDL 1.1 and 2.0
> > 
> > 
> > There are a few other typos as well.  I can deal with those 
> and c, d.
> > 
> > Ashok, can you answer a and b?
> > 
> > I've updated the round 4 docs with your previous post.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Dave
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org 
> > > [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
> Asir Vedamuthu
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 5:42 PM
> > > To: Ashok Malhotra; public-ws-policy@w3.org
> > > Subject: RE: Testcases for External Attachment WSDL 1.1 and 2.0
> > >
> > >
> > > Few follow up questions/comments:
> > >
> > > a) Shouldn't there be two expected results (one for Test case
> > > 1 and another for Test case 2) in both these documents?
> > >
> > > b) In the WSDL 20 test case, the input WSDL document has a 
> > > PolicyReference element (<wsp:PolicyReference 
> URI="#A12Endpoint). Is 
> > > that intentional?
> > >
> > > c) Typos in WSDL 20 test cases -
> > > s/#wsdlBindingMessageReference/#wsdl.bindingMessageReference/g
> > >
> > > d) Typos in WSDL 11 test cases -
> > > s/#wsdl11.binding.input/#wsdl11.bindingOperation.input/g
> > > s/#wsdl11.binding.output/#wsdl11.bindingOperation.output/g
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Asir S Vedamuthu
> > > Microsoft Corporation
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org 
> > > [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
> Ashok Malhotra
> > > Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 12:48 PM
> > > To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
> > > Subject: Testcases for External Attachment WSDL 1.1 and 2.0
> > >
> > > I have made the changes that Asir suggested.  Please take a look.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > All the best, Ashok
> > >
> > >
> > 
> 
Received on Saturday, 10 March 2007 01:42:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:48 GMT