W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > June 2007

Re: [Bug 4662] [Guidelines] Proposal for AI 305 - Comments relative to Issue 4662 (Corrected)

From: Monica J. Martin <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:31:22 -0700
To: "'mhondo@us.ibm.com'" <mhondo@us.ibm.com>, "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Message-id: <467BF95A.3000307@sun.com>

Following in the same stead as Asir, here are my comments relative to 
Issue 4662 [1] that have already been posted [2]. These serve as a 
correction to the cut-paste error [3]. Thank you.

    Comment: In Section 5.6.1, since the use of wsp:Optional is not
    directional, revise slightly. Reason: Both may specify policies.This
    proposed change is consistent with succeeding text early in Section
    5.6.2.

        * Change from: "The provider may influence what is possible by
          choosing whether or not to include policy alternatives in a
          policy expression, by using the wsp:Optional attribute.

        * Change to: "The consumer or provider may influence what is
          possible by choosing whether or not to include policy
          alternatives in a policy expression, by using the wsp:Optional
          attribute. "


[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4664
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jun/0069.html
[3] (Cut paste error) 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jun/0086.html
[4]  Reference: "Since optional behaviors indicate optionality for 
**both the provider and the consumer**, behaviors that must always be 
engaged by a consumer must not be marked as "optional" with a value 
"true" since this would allow the consumer to select the policy 
alternative that does not contain the assertion, and thus not engaging 
the behavior."
Received on Friday, 22 June 2007 16:30:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:52 GMT