W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > July 2007

NEW Issue: 4854 [Guidelines] Fictitious, why not real examples?

From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:47:47 -0700
To: "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C9BF0238EED3634BA1866AEF14C7A9E5443818750D@NA-EXMSG-C116.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Title: [Guidelines] Fictitious, why not real examples?

Description:

Section 5.6.1 [1] uses fictitious examples such as:

/samplePrefix:SampleAssertion/@any

Why not use a real assertion? Say, WS-Addressing Policy Assertions [2] or WS Reliable Messaging Policy Assertion [3].

Justification:

Should consider using real assertions, when available.

Proposal:

Use Ws-Addressing policy assertions or WS Reliable Messaging Policy Assertion.

[1] http://tinyurl.com/2hm9cc#d3e783
[2] http://www.w3.org/2007/05/addressing/metadata/ws-addr-metadata.xsd
[3]
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200702/wsrmp-1.1-spec-os-01.html#_Toc160540908

Regards,

Asir S Vedamuthu
Microsoft Corporation
Received on Friday, 13 July 2007 01:48:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:52 GMT