W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > January 2007

RE: policy scenarios and test cases

From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:59:55 -0800
Message-ID: <1E0F0378382054439F14D5450650478F0C19B5B2@RED-MSG-42.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>, Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>, <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
+1, let's call this 'Feature 43 - Negative Test Cases'.

 

Regards,

 

Asir S Vedamuthu

Microsoft Corporation

 

From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Prasad Yendluri
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 8:34 AM
To: Christopher B Ferris; public-ws-policy@w3.org
Subject: RE: policy scenarios and test cases

 

+1

 

Regards,

Prasad

 

________________________________

From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Christopher B
Ferris
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 7:55 AM
To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
Subject: policy scenarios and test cases

 


All, 

It occured to me that we should be adding negative test cases to the set
of scenarios 
for ws-policy, building off of the set of test cases in the original
contribution [1]. e.g., we should have 
examples of policy documents that include wsp elements or attributes in
the wrong places... 
examples of use of extensibility where it may not be allowed, etc. 

Just a thought. 

[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jun/0010.html 

Cheers, 

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris
phone: +1 508 377 9295
Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2007 02:00:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:45 GMT