I posted a proposal to the WS-addressing list to resolve the LC comment on ws addressing metadata spec as: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2007Feb/0016.html I post this proposal reference to both email lists, to facilitate discussion by both ws-policy and ws-addr wg members of this proposed solution. Please post comments on this proposal to both lists. by the way, I now fully support proposal alternative a) since it has a wire-testable definition of the NonAnonymousResponses policy assertion (nonAnonymous = "not wsa:anonymous". Tom Rutt -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133Received on Wednesday, 28 February 2007 19:22:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:47 GMT