W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > February 2007

RE: Ignorable assertions and interoperability

From: Yalcinalp, Umit <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:26:32 -0800
Message-ID: <2BA6015847F82645A9BB31C7F9D641650372D25A@uspale20.pal.sap.corp>
To: "Sergey Beryozkin" <sergey.beryozkin@iona.com>, <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
The more accurate wording is that the ignorable assertions are not
designed to introduce wire level artifacts, rather than
interoperability. 
 
Would that address your concern? 
 


________________________________

	From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sergey Beryozkin
	Sent: Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 2:52 AM
	To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
	Subject: Ignorable assertions and interoperability
	
	
	Hi
	 
	During the latest concall it was recommended to advise not to
use ignorable assertions if the interoperability would be affected...I
thought it was a strong statement at a time. 
	The reason for that was that I was assuming at a time a
WS-Policy level interoperability was referred to.
	Most of the time it's obvious what interoperability the
spec/primer texts refer to, but I feel it would be useful to revisit (in
the primer and guidelines) all references to the 'interoperability'
terms and qualify them as appropriate...
	 
	Cheers, Sergey Beryozkin
Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 20:24:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:47 GMT