W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > February 2007

Re: Ignorable assertions and interoperability

From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 07:52:58 -0500
To: "Sergey Beryozkin" <sergey.beryozkin@iona.com>
Cc: public-ws-policy@w3.org, public-ws-policy-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF1B9B14C2.11AE573E-ON85257288.00468259-85257288.0046C4D5@us.ibm.com>
Sergey,

Would you please log this as a bug against the primer and guidelines so 
that it can be tracked?

Also, it would help to have specific areas of the primer and guidelines 
that mention interoperability
so that we can focus on what exactly needs to be changed.

Finally, if you could provide a proposal to address your concerns, that 
would help greatly towards
closing the issue.

Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris
phone: +1 508 377 9295

public-ws-policy-request@w3.org wrote on 02/20/2007 05:52:22 AM:

> Hi
> 
> During the latest concall it was recommended to advise not to use 
> ignorable assertions if the interoperability would be affected...I 
> thought it was a strong statement at a time. 
> The reason for that was that I was assuming at a time a WS-Policy 
> level interoperability was referred to.
> Most of the time it's obvious what interoperability the spec/primer 
> texts refer to, but I feel it would be useful to revisit (in the 
> primer and guidelines) all references to the 'interoperability' 
> terms and qualify them as appropriate...
> 
> Cheers, Sergey Beryozkin
Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 12:53:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:47 GMT