RE: [Primer] Proposal for 4253 change section 2-2

Paul,

Maybe its something we should just open a general issue about, seeing as 
we plan to have a response to the
working group, things may yet change again.

Just thought we should have a way to track this.
Otherwise people might be confused.

Maryann



Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> 
02/14/2007 03:42 PM

To
Maryann Hondo/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, Daniel Roth <Daniel.Roth@microsoft.com>
cc
"public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>, 
"public-ws-policy-request@w3.org" <public-ws-policy-request@w3.org>, 
William Henry <william.henry@iona.com>
Subject
RE: [Primer] Proposal for 4253 change section 2-2






The CR draft that contained the referenced UsingAddressing assertion has 
been “replaced” by the WS-Addressing WG but it is still out there, the 
spec is still on the TR page and the namespace is still there.
 
Maybe that is not “valid” to you but the reference is not broken.
 
/paulc 
 
Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329
mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com




From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org 
[mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Maryann Hondo
Sent: February 14, 2007 2:54 PM
To: Daniel Roth
Cc: public-ws-policy@w3.org; public-ws-policy-request@w3.org; William 
Henry
Subject: RE: [Primer] Proposal for 4253 change section 2-2
 

Dan & William, 

I'm not sure "UsingAddressing" is valid any more. You might want to update 
the example as well. 

Maryann 


Daniel Roth <Daniel.Roth@microsoft.com> 
Sent by: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org 
02/14/2007 12:14 PM 


To
William Henry <william.henry@iona.com>, "public-ws-policy@w3.org" 
<public-ws-policy@w3.org> 
cc
 
Subject
RE: [Primer] Proposal for 4253 change section 2-2
 


 
 





This looks good to me.

Daniel Roth

-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org 
[mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of William Henry
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 8:52 AM
To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
Subject: [Primer] Proposal for 4253 change section 2-2


Proposal to resolve 4253 ( http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?

id=4253 )

Add the following text to section 2-2 - Replace the paragraph under
example 2-2 with the following and modify the subsequent example
numbers by incrementing.

The policy expression in the above example consists of a Policy main
element and a child element wsap:UsingAddressing. Child elements of
the Policy element are policy assertions. Contoso attaches the above
policy expression to a WSDL binding description.

Example 2-3. Policy Expression Attached to Binding
<wsdl:binding name="AddressingBinding"
type="tns:RealTimeDataInterface" >
  <Policy>
    <wsap:UsingAddressing />
  </Policy>
  ...
</wsdl:binding>

Policies can also be attached to WSDL using references (See 2.10
Attaching Policy Expressions to WSDL.)

<----END OF TEXT ---->
HTML for the editors to add:

The policy expression in the above example consists of a
<code>Policy</code> main element and a child element
<code>wsap:UsingAddressing.</code> Child elements of the
<code>Policy</code> element are policy assertions. Contoso attaches
the above policy expression to a WSDL binding description.</p><div
class="exampleOuter"><p style="text-align: left"
class="exampleHead"><i><span>Example 2-3. </span>Policy Expression
Attached to Binding</i></p><div
class="exampleInner"><pre>&lt;wsdl:binding name="AddressingBinding"
type="tns:RealTimeDataInterface" &gt;
  &lt;Policy&gt;
    &lt;wsap:UsingAddressing /&gt;
  &lt;/Policy&gt;
  ...
&lt;/wsdl:binding&gt;</pre></div></div>

Policies can also be attached to WSDL using references (See <a
href="#attaching-policy-expressions-to-wsdl"><b>2.10 Attaching Policy
Expressions to WSDL</b></a> ).


Regards
William