W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > April 2007

UDDI Interop results reporting descripency verification (WG Actio n Item 281)

From: Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:05:57 -0400
Message-ID: <497B3BF095D687408EC268A103E85E855C8B8B@ca-exbe1.webm.webmethods.com>
To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
Cc: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>, Toufic Boubez <tboubez@layer7tech.com>, Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>


Asir & I took and Action  (
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/281 ) on the WG call to
verify if the UDDI round 4 interop results reported for all parties involved
are accurate at this point.  Asir, myself and Toufic have since connected
and reviewed the results and are satisfied that the results as ported at
this point are accurate. For both webMethods and Layer-7 that acted as
clients for two different UDDI service providers the total number of test
cases is 34 (14 for each server (14x2=28) plus 6 for effective policy
calculations done by the clients). That is what is recorded in the test
results. There are <tbd> entries for test cases that are not applicable.
E.g. Layer-7 is a client and does not test against itself. I understand Asir
has an AI to rename tbd's to be n/a, which is an issue tangential to this
and applicable to all results reported.



While doing the above verification we did notice a problem with the test
results summary table (at:
d-summary.html>  )

Some of the cells that reported 100% of the results (to be successful) but
the corresponding table cells are filled only 

partially with the green color, implying something is still pending.  For
example, in the "Round 4 MediaType Results" column, 

the cell that corresponds to Microsoft has "2 of 2"  but the cell is only
partially green. Similarly in the "Round 4 UDDI Results" column

the cells for Layer-7 and webMethods have "34 of 34" but, the cells are only
partially green. Could this be an issue with the results processing and
reporting mechanism? 


 I will raise the above as an issue directly with the pertinent people that
tend to the pieces related to generation of the results summary.



Received on Thursday, 19 April 2007 19:06:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:38:33 UTC