W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > September 2006

RE: Editors request clarification on Primer source(s)

From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 07:21:26 -0700
To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
CC: "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>, "public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org" <public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org>, Maryann Hondo <mhondo@us.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <4D66CCFC0B64BA4BBD79D55F6EBC22570ED21BBC0E@NA-EXMSG-C103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

I propose we add this matter to the F2F agenda and deal with it next week.

You will note that I recently asked if Maryann and Umit were going to complete their AI on an outline of the guidelines document by the F2F:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Sep/0019.html

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329
mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com





> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Orchard
> Sent: September 6, 2006 12:42 AM
> To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
> Subject: Editors request clarification on Primer source(s)
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> The editorial team requests guidance and clarification from the WG on
> constructing the Primer.  We looked over the minutes of the first f2f,
> and it was not said therein that the understanding policy by Asir would
> be a source or the source or not a source for the Primer.  It simply
> said roughly "convert into xmlspec".  We note that there is an
> outstanding AI for potential primer material from Umit and Maryann.
>
> It is also not clear the relationship between these.  Imagine both are
> used as input.  Which one is "the basis" and which one provides "diffs"?
> For example, should material from Umit and Maryann be deltas against
> Understanding?  Or should Asir (or editors?) go through and propose how
> to merge the documents as equals?
>
> We ask the WG to instruct us on what materials should be used in the
> primer, and their relative primacy.
>
> On behalf of the editorial team,
> Dave
Received on Wednesday, 6 September 2006 14:26:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:41 GMT