W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > October 2006

Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721

From: Sergey Beryozkin <sergey.beryozkin@iona.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:24:42 +0100
Message-ID: <026001c6f1e7$391c4050$3901020a@sberyoz>
To: "Fabian Ritzmann" <Fabian.Ritzmann@Sun.COM>, "Daniel Roth" <Daniel.Roth@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Frederick Hirsch" <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, "Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>, <public-ws-policy@w3.org>

Hi


> I agree if these assertions only have a meaning to the entity to which a 
> policy is attached. But you might e.g. have service brokers that 
> understand only those assertions that are necessary for their operation, 
> while the actual services and clients have a richer vocabulary. Or you 
> might have service assertions that are proprietary to a vendor and only 
> have a meaning for the web service clients from that vendor.

This sounds like a good example to me, especially the first one where stripping such service server-only assertions may not work...
For the second example I think existing policy alternatives will work...

Cheers, Sergey

> 
> Fabian
>
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2006 12:25:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:42 GMT