W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > October 2006

RE: Revised proposal for Bug 3730

From: Daniel Roth <Daniel.Roth@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:58:46 -0700
To: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E2903CF1E4B5B144B559237FDFB291CE181693D2@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Hi Ashok,

Thanks for sending out a new proposal.  I see that you added a wrapper element, which is great.

The policy attachment spec uses the terms Policy Scope and Policy Subject when defining attachment mechanisms.  You attach policies to Policy Scopes which associates the attached policy with all Policy Subjects within that Policy Scope.  This language is also used to describe how policies are merged when multiple policies are attached to different scopes containing the same Policy Subject.  This proposal describes how to use a WSDL 2.0 component reference as a domain expression, but it doesn't say what the implied Policy Scopes and Policy Subjects are.  I'm guessing they should be the same as the Policy Scopes and Subjects already defined for WSDL 2.0 attachment.

Also the current proposal doesn't use any RFC language, and it probably needs to if you want the proposal simply copied into the attachment spec.  This could just be an action item for the editors.

Daniel Roth

-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ashok Malhotra
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 2:15 PM
To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
Subject: Revised proposal for Bug 3730


As requested, I have defined an element wrapper for the URI Reference that indicated the WSDL 2.0 component.

All the best, Ashok
Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2006 16:03:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:42 GMT