Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721

Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721Hi

Reference to the thread[1] is misleading IMHO.
I was stating from the start that a proposed wsp:local was nothing to do with what is discussed in that thread. The semantics of wsp:local are : mark assertions which *must be ignored* by a requester. That is it, no more semantics...

Thanks, Sergey
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Yalcinalp, Umit 
  To: public-ws-policy@w3.org 
  Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 11:44 PM
  Subject: Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721




  There has been a lot of discussion on Issues 3721 and 3564. I am posting this response to this thread in order to illustrate why there are two separate issues that need to be tackled independently. However, they are NOT the same issue. Utilization of optional assertions is a separate concern and those issues must not be lumped together. 

  Please find some comments in a different thread that explains why there are two separate issues here for the details [1]. 

  Thanks, 

  --umit 

  [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Oct/0016.html 

  ---------------------- 

  Dr. Umit Yalcinalp 
  Architect 
  NetWeaver Industry Standards 
  SAP Labs, LLC 
  Email: umit.yalcinalp@sap.com Tel: (650) 320-3095 
  SDN: https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/u/36238 
  -------- 
  "First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, 
  then they fight you, then you win." Gandhi