W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > July 2006

RE: [VER 3] WS-Policy WG Teleconference 03 Agenda 2006-07-26

From: Yalcinalp, Umit <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:41:24 -0700
Message-ID: <2BA6015847F82645A9BB31C7F9D6416501CE82D5@uspale20.pal.sap.corp>
To: "Glen Daniels" <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>, <public-ws-policy@w3.org>

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Glen Daniels
> Sent: Friday, Jul 28, 2006 9:19 AM
> To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
> Subject: RE: [VER 3] WS-Policy WG Teleconference 03 Agenda 2006-07-26
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > IMO, w3c January meeting should be considered as a driver for this
> > decision, rather than having 2 f2f meetings in the west 
> > coast. Further,
> 
> Only if there are indeed other groups which we expect to have fruitful
> crossover interactions with.
> 
> > you get the benefit of dealing with bad weather only once (sorry EST
> > folks :-)
> 
> Boston in November is quite lovely most of the time (though there are
> never guarantees) - crisp days and cool nights, with lots of delicious
> fall cuisine.  January, on the other hand, will be frigid, with snow a
> distinct possibility.
> 
> I guess we can perhaps vote on this on an upcoming call.  I'd 
> personally
> vote for Nov in Boston and Jan in San Francisco.

Just to be clear, the first decision that needs to be made is whether we
need to co-locate with the w3c plenary. If that is not a constraining
factor, +1 to your personal choices as well. 

> 
> --Glen
> 

--umit

> 
Received on Friday, 28 July 2006 16:38:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:40 GMT