W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > July 2006

NEW ISSUE: Conformance Sections needed for both Specs

From: Yalcinalp, Umit <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:37:48 -0700
Message-ID: <2BA6015847F82645A9BB31C7F9D6416501CE7649@uspale20.pal.sap.corp>
To: <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Title: Conformance Sections needed for both specs

Description: 

Currently, the WS-Policy Framework [WS-Policy] and WS-Policy Attachment
[WS-PolicyAttachment] specifications do not contain a conformance
section. 

Justification: 

Other WS specifications that specify a language, protocol or utilization
of a language contain a conformance section in W3C and other standards
organizations. 

The examples include, but not limited to,  

-- WSDL 2.0 specification [WSDL 2.0] Section 1.2 Document Conformance
and Section 8.
-- WS-Addressing SOAP Binding Specification [WS-Addressing SOAP Binding]
Section 8. 
-- WS-Addressing WSDL Binding Specification [WS-Addressing WSDL Binding]
Section 6. 

Target: WS-Policy Framework and WS-Policy Attachment specifications

Proposal: 

Add a separate conformance section to both specifications, WS-Policy
Framework and WS-Policy Attachment. 

References: 

[WSDL 2.0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-wsdl20-20060327
[WS-Addressing SOAP Binding]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-ws-addr-soap-20060509/#conformance
[WS-Addressing WSDL Binding]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-ws-addr-wsdl-20060529/

----------------------

Dr. Umit Yalcinalp
Architect
NetWeaver Industry Standards
SAP Labs, LLC
Email: umit.yalcinalp@sap.com Tel: (650) 320-3095 
SDN: https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/u/36238
Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2006 21:35:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:40 GMT