W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > July 2006

RE: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/13-ws-policy-minutes.html#action08

From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 22:36:16 -0700
Message-ID: <4DF3D07B9910264B9470DA1F811D1A950ADA51E3@RED-MSG-43.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
I think the syntax and semantics of domain expressions should be
respectfully delegated to experts in their respective domains.

 

+ 1 to remove section 4.2 in WS-PolicyAttachment.

 

Regards,
 
Asir S Vedamuthu

Microsoft Corporation

 

________________________________

From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ashok Malhotra
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 9:45 AM
To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
Subject: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/13-ws-policy-minutes.html#action08

 

Section 3.4 of the PolicyAttachment document introduces an External
Policy attachment mechanism

that uses a domainExpression to refer to the policy subject.  But there
is little discussion of what domain

expressions can refer to.

 

Section 4.2 of the PolicyAttachment document gives an example of a
domainExpression.

First, this is a non-example as it says little about the
domainExpression.  In fact, it says less than the 

example at the end of 3.4.

Second, there is no reason for this example to be separated from section
3.4.

 

My note,
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jul/0019.html
suggests domainExpression designs

that allow a WSDL 1.1 definition, a http message or a JMS message to be
referred to as a policy subject.

 

SUGGESTION 1: Remove section 4.2.  It serves no purpose.

 

SUGGESTION 2: Add some discussion of domainExpressions using examples
from my note above.

 

All the best, Ashok 
Received on Thursday, 20 July 2006 05:37:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:40 GMT