W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org > May 2007

[Bug 4555] Should policy intersection be called policy intersection?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 02:58:54 +0000
CC:
To: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Hr3XS-0007mh-UW@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4555


asirveda@microsoft.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Comment #1 from asirveda@microsoft.com  2007-05-24 02:58 -------
<cferris> Replace

"Intersection is a commutative function that takes two policies and returns a
policy."

With

"Policy intersection is a commutative operation performed on two policies that
yields a policy that contains a collection of the compatible policy
alternatives. (Note: while policy intersection at times is analogous with set
intersection, it does not imply formal set intersection semantics)."

david: if i had had that term i would have had fewer false assumptions

<cferris> RESOLUTION: issue 4555 closed with the above definition for policy
intersection added to Terminology section

http://www.w3.org/2007/05/23-ws-policy-minutes.html#item08
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2007 02:58:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:08 GMT