W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org > July 2007

[Bug 4654] [Guidelines] Guidelines for Policy Attachment

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:38:21 +0000
CC:
To: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1IB5zB-0002MN-4u@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4654


chrisfer@us.ibm.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Comment #1 from chrisfer@us.ibm.com  2007-07-18 09:38 -------
See http://www.w3.org/2007/07/18-ws-policy-irc#T09-34-40
RESOLUTION: issue 4654 closed by adopting maryann's section 5.7.1 in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jul/0030.html (pdf)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jul/0024.html (doc)

[05:31] pbc: Possible additional work:
[05:32] pbc: 1. How to make existing WSDL section more specific to just WSDL
[05:32] cferris: RESOLUTION: issue 4654 closed by adopting maryann's section
5.7.1 in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jul/0030.html
[05:32] pbc: 2. Determine which existing BP in existing WSDL section should be
made generic
[05:32] pbc: 3. Determine if the WSDL section should handle WSDL 1.1 and WSDL
2.0 separately
[05:32] cferris: rrsagent, where am i?
[05:32] RRSAgent: See http://www.w3.org/2007/07/18-ws-policy-irc#T09-34-40
[05:33] pbc: 4. Determine if attachment terminology is used consistently in new
General Guidelines section and the existing WSDL section
[05:33] *** maryann has joined #ws-policy.
[05:33] charlton:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jul/0030.html (pdf)
[05:34] charlton:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jul/0024.html (doc)
[05:34] pbc: 5. Determine if any other specific sections are required for other
attachment possibilities like UDDI
[05:35] pbc: 6. Can the BP in the WSDL section (or new section) be linked back
to the generic versions in the General Guidelines section?
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2007 09:38:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:02:10 UTC