W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org > July 2007

[Bug 4854] [Guidelines] Fictitious, why not real examples?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 01:37:46 +0000
CC:
To: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1I9A6M-0001A9-GP@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4854

           Summary: [Guidelines] Fictitious, why not real examples?
           Product: WS-Policy
           Version: FPWD
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Guidelines
        AssignedTo: fsasaki@w3.org
        ReportedBy: asirveda@microsoft.com
         QAContact: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org


Title: [Guidelines] Fictitious, why not real examples?

Description:

Section 5.6.1 [1] uses fictitious examples such as:

/samplePrefix:SampleAssertion/@any

Why not use a real assertion? Say, WS-Addressing Policy Assertions [2] or WS
Reliable Messaging Policy Assertion [3].

Justification:

Should consider using real assertions, when available.

Proposal:

Use Ws-Addressing policy assertions or WS Reliable Messaging Policy Assertion.

[1] http://tinyurl.com/2hm9cc#d3e783
[2] http://www.w3.org/2007/05/addressing/metadata/ws-addr-metadata.xsd
[3]
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200702/wsrmp-1.1-spec-os-01.html#_Toc160540908
Received on Friday, 13 July 2007 01:37:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:02:10 UTC