W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org > September 2006

[Bug 3619] add an inssue on coordination with other working groups

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 15:53:40 +0000
CC:
To: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1GKzie-00049u-Qb@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3619





------- Comment #2 from mhondo@us.ibm.com  2006-09-06 15:53 -------
>From Paul Cotton- 
Add an issue on coordination with other working groups
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3619

Maryann carried out her action to ask the WS-Addressing WG to review the
example in Section 3.4 of WS-PolicyAttachments:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2006Aug/0087.html

We need to consider the questions asked by Marc Hadley in his response to
Maryann's request:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2006Aug/0089.html

"Have you considered the semantics when other things are included in
the EndpointReference. In particular, if the EPR contains a metadata
element with an embedded wsp:Policy (either directly or via an
intermediate embedded or referenced WSDL), how are the policies
reconciled?"
Received on Wednesday, 6 September 2006 15:54:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:08 GMT