public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org from December 2006 by subject

[Bug 3560] The framework specification should also enable the usage of xml:id

[Bug 3952] Change optional example from MTOM to security (Guidelines and Primer)

[Bug 3953] Remove language that use of security policy assertions forces nested assertions for other domains

[Bug 3965] Clarify text surrounding PolicyReference and for usage of wsp:Name attribute

[Bug 3980] [Guidelines] Should Assume Basic Understanding of WS-Policy

[Bug 3982] [Guidelines] The introduction should state that the document only targets policy assertion authors

[Bug 3983] [Guidelines] Use 'Assertion Author (s)' Consistently

[Bug 3984] [Guidelines] Assertion Parameters vs. Name Value Pairs

[Bug 4035] Guidelines Section 2 should account for impact of assertions that do not manifest on the wire, or only apply to one party but may still impact the ability to interoperate, depending on whether they may be ignored.

[Bug 4038] Nested policy in normal form - Example does not match expectations

[Bug 4039] WS-Policy does not define its relationship to XML Base

[Bug 4040] Update guidelines to include discussion of ignorable

[Bug 4041] Update primer to mention ignorable as needed

[Bug 4042] Editorial fix to Media type description

[Bug 4045] scoping of wsdl1.1 identifiers spec

[Bug 4068] XML Schema does not allow for validating xml:id in policy documents

[Bug 4069] Updating References for Use of xml:id

[Bug 4072] [Guidance] Statements not relevant to assertion design

[Bug 4073] [Guidelines] Free standing statements

[Bug 4074] [Guidelines] Collection of unclear Guidance or text issues

[Bug 4103] Questionable use of fictitious corp. name "Contoso Ltd."

Last message date: Thursday, 21 December 2006 20:49:04 UTC