W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy-interop@w3.org > June 2007

RE: Additional lax intersection testing

From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:53:03 -0400
To: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
Cc: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>, "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>, "public-ws-policy-interop@w3.org" <public-ws-policy-interop@w3.org>, public-ws-policy-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF8ABC9E6B.6D9AD451-ON852572FB.004B7B42-852572FB.004C2708@us.ibm.com>
Please disregard... I just now noticed that Doug has already done this.

Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris
phone: +1 508 234 2986

__________________

Attached is an updated version of the optional lax intersection with 
nested policy test cases that reflect the
issues raised by Asir.

[attachment "interop.zip" deleted by Christopher B Ferris/Waltham/IBM] 

Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris
phone: +1 508 234 2986

public-ws-policy-request@w3.org wrote on 06/08/2007 08:17:45 PM:

> We reviewed these additional optional test cases. They look good. 
> There are two MINOR issues:
> 
> 1)  Expected outcome policy expressions are in a partial normal form
> [1]. Thus far, all the expected outcome policy expressions in the 
> interop directory are in the normal form. If you would like to be 
> consistent then all the expected policy expressions need to be 
normalized.
> 2)  Expected outcome for intersection(lax, policy-35, policy-36) is 
> labeled as ?-xml? instead of ?.xml?.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Asir S Vedamuthu
> Microsoft Corporation
> 
> 
> 
> [1] For instance, there are two assertions in the following policy 
> expression. Of them, the first assertion is in the normal form and 
> second assertion is not.
> 
> <wsp:Policy xmlns:wsp="http://www.w3.org/ns/ws-policy">
>  <wsp:ExactlyOne>
>   <wsp:All>
>    <logging:Logging wsp:Ignorable="true" xmlns:logging="http:
> //example.org/policy-test">
>     <wsp:Policy>
>      <wsp:ExactlyOne>
>       <wsp:All>
>        <logging:TwentyFourSeven wsp:Ignorable="true"/>
>       </wsp:All>
>      </wsp:ExactlyOne>
>     </wsp:Policy>
>    </logging:Logging>
>    <logging:Logging wsp:Ignorable="true" xmlns:logging="http:
> //example.org/policy-test">
>     <wsp:Policy>
>      <logging:TwentyFourSeven wsp:Ignorable="true"/>
>     </wsp:Policy>
>    </logging:Logging>
>   </wsp:All>
>  </wsp:ExactlyOne>
> </wsp:Policy>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: public-ws-policy-interop-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-
> policy-interop-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Doug Davis
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 10:02 AM
> To: public-ws-policy@w3.org; public-ws-policy-interop@w3.org
> Subject: Additional lax intersection testing
> 
> 
> ***********************
> Warning: Your file, interop.zip, contains more than 32 files after 
> decompression and cannot be scanned.
> ***********************
> 
> 
> IBM would like to contribue the following tests to the ws-policy wg 
> for additonal, optional, testing of the lax intersection involving 
> nested policy. 
> 
> 
> 
> thanks
> -Doug
> ______________________________________________________
> STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group
> (919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
Received on Friday, 15 June 2007 13:53:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:07 GMT