W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy-interop@w3.org > April 2007

RE: Round4 external attachment testing

From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:10:47 -0400
To: "Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
Cc: "public-ws-policy-interop@w3.org" <public-ws-policy-interop@w3.org>, "public-ws-policy-interop-request@w3.org" <public-ws-policy-interop-request@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OFE88B7DA5.5A454A7B-ON852572C9.006EBA81-852572C9.006ECEA3@us.ibm.com>
We should remove the following sentence then:
        The message formats follow the formats defined in the WS-Policy 
Scenarios document

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com



"Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> 
04/26/2007 04:06 PM

To
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc
"public-ws-policy-interop@w3.org" <public-ws-policy-interop@w3.org>, 
"public-ws-policy-interop-request@w3.org" 
<public-ws-policy-interop-request@w3.org>
Subject
RE: Round4 external attachment testing






The exact format is an implementation choice.
All the best, Ashok 

From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 12:02 PM
To: Ashok Malhotra
Cc: public-ws-policy-interop@w3.org; 
public-ws-policy-interop-request@w3.org
Subject: RE: Round4 external attachment testing
 

Ashok, 
 what's the format of the message?  I couldn't find it in the doc.  If the 
format doesn't matter, its an impl choice of how (or even "if")  to do it 
because nothing goes on the wire, then we should remove that part of the 
scenario description. 

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com 


"Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> 
Sent by: public-ws-policy-interop-request@w3.org 
04/26/2007 01:14 PM 


To
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, "public-ws-policy-interop@w3.org" 
<public-ws-policy-interop@w3.org> 
cc
 
Subject
RE: Round4 external attachment testing
 


 
 




Hi Doug: 
Perhaps we shd have used different words. 
  
Essentially, there are 3 inputs: policies, external attachment 
specifications, WSDL.   
There is one output: The input WSLD with policy references added. 
  
In doing the tests, we found that some of the namespace references were 
omitted or incorrect. 
You shd fix these when you write your test. 
All the best, Ashok 
 


From: public-ws-policy-interop-request@w3.org 
[mailto:public-ws-policy-interop-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Doug Davis
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 9:52 AM
To: public-ws-policy-interop@w3.org
Subject: Round4 external attachment testing 
  

Couple of questions on the round4 external attachment testing: 
- the doc says these are unit testcase and not interop ones, but it also 
talks about a requestor and service and sending a message around. If 
they're unit testcases then it would seem we wouldn't need to define these 
roles. Are they really unit testcases?  if so, defining these roles seems 
unnecessary. Any reason its not a true interop test? 
- the doc talks about the format of the message between the requestor and 
service but I couldn't find it in the doc - where is it? 

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com 
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2007 20:11:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:06 GMT