W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org > May 2007

RE: is everyone done with their framework & attachment AI's?

From: Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 14:53:38 -0700
Message-ID: <497B3BF095D687408EC268A103E85E857FFDC6@ca-exbe1.webm.webmethods.com>
To: "Maryann Hondo" <mhondo@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org>, <public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org>
Folks,

 

Ok, Maryann and I connected. 

Maryann just checked in the updated glossary-framework.xml file, that
resolves the problem.

 

The Framework.html generates fine for me also now.

 

Thanks.

 

Prasad

 

________________________________

From: Maryann Hondo [mailto:mhondo@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 2:33 PM
To: Prasad Yendluri
Cc: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org; public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org
Subject: RE: is everyone done with their framework & attachment AI's?

 


Prasad, 
Can I call you somewhere, because I'm not seeing this problem. 

Maryann 



"Prasad Yendluri" <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com> 
Sent by: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org 

05/29/2007 05:22 PM 

To

Maryann Hondo/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, <public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org> 

cc

 

Subject

RE: is everyone done with their framework & attachment AI's?

 

 

 




Hi Maryann, 
  
I have not been able to complete my AIs. 
  
I was going to check-in my changes today by just realized the framework
document is broken. 
The build file fails while generating the HTML part way through. 
See my email:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy-eds/2007May/0166.ht
ml
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy-eds/2007May/0166.h
tml>  
  
I will not be able to proceed until this problem is resolved. 
  
Regards, 
Prasad 
  

 

________________________________


From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Maryann Hondo
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 2:21 PM
To: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
Subject: is everyone done with their framework & attachment AI's? 
  

I'm not sure how we track this.... 

here's the list I have: 

ACTION-274 <http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/274>  

OPEN 

[Framework] Implement the resolution for issue 4577
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/274>  

Asir Vedamuthu 

2007-05-30 

ACTION-275 <http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/275>  

OPEN 

[Framework] Implement the resolution for issue 4552
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/275>  

Maryann Hondo 

2007-05-30 

ACTION-276 <http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/276>  

OPEN 

[Framework] Implement the resolution for issue 4556
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/276>  

Maryann Hondo 

2007-05-30 

ACTION-278 <http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/278>  

OPEN 

[Framework] Implement the resolution for issue 4553
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/278>  

Prasad Yendluri 

2007-05-30 

ACTION-279 <http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/279>  

OPEN 

[Framework] Implement the resolution for issue 4555
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/279>  

Prasad Yendluri 

2007-05-30 

ACTION-280 <http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/280>  

OPEN 

[Framework] Implement the resolution for issue 4554
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/280>  

Prasad Yendluri 

2007-05-30


  

ACTION-312 <http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/312>  

OPEN 

[Framework] implement the resolution for issue 4579
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/312>  

Asir Vedamuthu 

2007-05-31


  

ACTION-297 <http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/297>  

CLOSED 

[Framework] Implement the resolution for issue 4544 (when the WG
approves <http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/297>  

David Orchard 

2007-05-31


  

ACTION-285 <http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/285>  

CLOSED 

[Attachment] Update the Attachment doc to align the QName and namespace
name of the WS-A Assertions from the WS-A Metadata Last Call document
dated May 2007 (4374
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/285>  

David Orchard 

2007-05-31






Asir is to generate the diffs tonight and I'll send mail to the WG
tomorrow if we're all set. 
I haven't done this  before so if someone has a cheat sheet it would be
great. 

Do I have to do anything more than include references to the diffs and
the point to the latest version? and what do 
you point to? In previous mail I've seen a link like
thishttp://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/ 
or this
<http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-framework
<http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-framework>
. 

Thanks. 
Maryann 
Received on Tuesday, 29 May 2007 21:53:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:03 GMT