W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org > January 2007

RE: Issue 4045 and Action-139 and 111

From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:51:39 -0800
Message-ID: <1E0F0378382054439F14D5450650478F0C21D5E9@RED-MSG-42.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, <public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org>

Also, replaced

"The scope of URI domain expressions for WSDL 2.0 components or WSDL 1.1
elements is limited to the subjects defined in this specification at
(ref to Attaching Policies Using WSDL 1.1 and WS-Policy Attachment for
WSDL 2.0)."

With

"The scope of URI domain expressions for WSDL 2.0 components or WSDL 1.1
elements is limited to the subjects defined in Section 5. WS-Policy
Attachment for WSDL 2.0 and 4. Attaching Policies Using WSDL 1.1."

Asir

-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 7:36 PM
To: Frederick Hirsch; public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
Subject: Issue 4045 and Action-139 and 111


FYI

In my previous check in, I applied the following missed item for issue
4045:

S/The annotation those policy expressions as required extensions/The
annotation of such policy expressions as required extensions/

Regards,
 
Asir S Vedamuthu
Microsoft Corporation
Received on Wednesday, 24 January 2007 03:51:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:00 GMT