Re: Action-90 Review - Part 2

I fixed these, but had trouble formatting the examples even though  
XML seems right. Maybe someone else can help. Please also check that  
the versioning section is correct.

I am now done with my editorial pass and action 84, and am passing  
this to Asir to generate the redline for editorial team review. The  
guidelines xml document is checked in.

Note I did not check in the corresponding html, since there are  
conflicts and I'm not sure how to say override the remote version  
with the local version, maybe someone can please explain how to do  
this without merging each change individually.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia


On Nov 29, 2006, at 11:03 PM, ext Asir Vedamuthu wrote:

> ACTION-90 [1] - Review Action 77 snapshot (document is at
> http://tinyurl.com/yjpbyf
>
> Section 5.3 'Evolution of Assertions' [1], Guidelines document,
> originated from the Primer (Section 4.4.7 'Versioning behaviors' [2]).
> There are two editorial issues in Section 5.3, Guidelines document:
>
> a) Primer examples 4-2 and 4-3 [2] didn't make it into the Guidelines
> document
> b) s/4.4.7. Over time/Over time/
>
> I request other editors to review Action 77 snapshot at
> http://tinyurl.com/yjpbyf
>
>
> [1]
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy- 
> guidelines-
> diff20061109.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#assertion- 
> evol
> ution
> [2]
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-ws-policy-primer-20061018/#versioning- 
> behav
> iors
>
> Regards,
>
> Asir S Vedamuthu
> Microsoft Corporation

Received on Thursday, 30 November 2006 04:47:27 UTC