W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org > November 2006

Re: schedule slip

From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:12:46 -0500
Message-Id: <60A76F1C-15E5-48C2-AC02-4B8D17A88AE8@nokia.com>
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, WS-Policy Editors W3C <public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org>
To: "ext Asir Vedamuthu" <asirveda@microsoft.com>

Maryann's report was fine.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia


On Nov 29, 2006, at 12:07 PM, ext Asir Vedamuthu wrote:

> I am confused. I am aware of one and only pending task: review  
> Action-77
> changes and fix typos/grammar, as appropriate.
>
> Regards,
>
> Asir S Vedamuthu
> Microsoft Corporation
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Frederick
> Hirsch
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 8:54 AM
> To: WS-Policy Editors W3C
> Cc: Hirsch Frederick
> Subject: schedule slip
>
>
> I think we should focus on the less aggressive date for the
> guidelines in the editor's report today,
> and perhaps even mention a possible later date than what we discussed
> on the call last week.
>
> The reason is twofold - I only received the update last night, so
> update will not be done in time for editors to review before next
> policy meeting (starting later means I am likely going to have to end
> later) and we appear to have issues with our editorial process which
> looks like it will slow us down.
>
> I'd rather set conservative expectations and then exceed them.
>
> regards, Frederick
>
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 29 November 2006 17:19:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:59 GMT