W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org > November 2006

RE: ACTION-69 - Nov 3rd Editors' Drafts

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:49:14 +0900
To: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
Cc: Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>, public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
Message-Id: <1162536554.5028.10.camel@fsasaki-desktop>

On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 12:29 -0800, Asir Vedamuthu wrote:
> Prasad,
> 
> I traced this through CVS revisions and found that Felix reformatted
> examples in Appendix B (necessary for PDF version) [1]. I'll add an
> entry to the change log prior to sending to the WG.

A question to the editors: Do you want the line numbering of examples in
the xmlspec source code? Currently line numbers are generated only in
the final HTML output. This has the side effect that they don't appear
in the diff document, see e.g. http://tinyurl.com/yl6lr4 .
To avoid this, I would propose to have a separate stylesheet to create
line numbers in the xmlspec source code. If you agree until 0 a.m. 4
November (Japanese time), I will create that stylesheet, upload it and
run it against the source files. I will also re-generate the DIFFs.

That would give Asir time to post the new drafts until noon Pacific, as
he proposed at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy-eds/2006Nov/0019.html .

Felix

> 
> [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy-eds/2006Oct/0112.ht
> ml 
> 
> Regards,
>  
> Asir S Vedamuthu
> Microsoft Corporation
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 12:15 PM
> To: Asir Vedamuthu; public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
> Subject: RE: ACTION-69 - Nov 3rd Editors' Drafts
> 
> Hi Asir,
> 
> Minor nit. The Diff for the attachment document highlights the tModels
> structures in sections B 1.3, B 2.3 and B 3.3 to have changed (green).
> However, the change-log entries in Appendix E do not seem to have any
> that
> relate to this change. I am sure the sections were touched for some
> reason
> by one of us while editing but, just wanted to draw attention to the
> fact,
> so that we are prepared in case anyone else raises a flag.
> 
> Regards,
> Prasad
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu
> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 11:23 AM
> To: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
> Subject: ACTION-69 - Nov 3rd Editors' Drafts
> 
> 
> >ACTION-69 is 'Generate CVS tags and send around for editors review'
> 
> I plan to post the following editors' drafts to the WG tomorrow at Noon
> Pacific. Please review and let me know if you find any issues.
> 
> (a) Framework
> http://tinyurl.com/y5yzqt OR
> 
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-framework.h
> tml?rev=1.65&content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8&only_with_tag=Edito
> rs-Draft-03-November-2006
> 
> (b) Framework DIFF (Since Nov 2nd Working Draft)
> http://tinyurl.com/yhhng6 OR
> 
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-framework-d
> iff20061102.html?rev=1.2&content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8&only_wi
> th_tag=Editors-Draft-03-November-2006
> 
> (c) Attachment
> http://tinyurl.com/yh6pdz OR
> 
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-attachment.
> html?rev=1.63&content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8&only_with_tag=Edit
> ors-Draft-03-November-2006
> 
> (d) Attachment DIFF (Since Nov 2nd Working Draft)
> http://tinyurl.com/y74slj OR
> 
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-attachment-
> diff20061102.html?rev=1.2&content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8&only_w
> ith_tag=Editors-Draft-03-November-2006
> 
> Regards,
>  
> Asir S Vedamuthu
> Microsoft Corporation
> 
Received on Friday, 3 November 2006 06:49:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:58 GMT