Hi Don, Should we get time on the WSA agenda for the same presentation? Colleen Don Mullen wrote: > Regrets for this upcoming meeting :-( - I am skiing in Park City, Utah with > my children :-). > > > 2. Discuss the document Jean-Jacques posted [1] (50min) > > Looks like a good start. I am somewhat concerned about how much we can have > ready to present at the next F2F - two weeks out. Perhaps a portion of > tomorrow's meeting could be spent discussing what kind of deliverable we can > have for that meeting. I know Jonathan would like to see a resolution on > features/properties by the end of the F2F, so it seems some kind of > presentation to the group will be in order. I think the focus should be on > the presentation, which means drilling in on the specifics of a couple of > the more compelling use-cases -- and resisting spending too much time on the > details of the rest. > > As a WSD WG member, I would want to know: > > o what are the use cases (we've started this discussion) > > o why can't this be solved with the general extension mechanism in WSDL? > > o what else might this affect other than WSD? > > I would like to volunteer to put time into putting together a presentation > for the F2F. > > > 3. Decide on date/time for next call (5min) > > The Tuesday 11am EST is designated as our time slot going forward -- > correct? > > DonReceived on Tuesday, 18 February 2003 12:37:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:17:44 GMT