RE: PFTF next telcon

Agreed.  If everyone on the list who will be participating on the calls
sends me a private email with the following information:

	o Your Timezone
	o Availability -- in blocks of time (your timezone)
	  listed in order of preference (most preferred to least)

I will put together a matrix and proposed weekly meeting time (or times).
Sending individual messages to the list isn't very productive.

**Please send by end of day today -- Tuesday**  That way, I can post
tomorrow morning.

Don

-----Original Message-----
From: David Orchard [mailto:dorchard@bea.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:06 PM
To: public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org
Subject: RE: PFTF next telcon

And not with the xmlp call, which is wednesdays at 11am pst.

But I hardly think this is ridiculous.  We each have many different
responsibilities, and each time a group starts, it's crazy finding the best
time.

Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Sanjiva
> Weerawarana
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:34 AM
> To: public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org
> Subject: Re: PFTF next telcon
>
>
>
> This is ridiculous- we'll never find a slot that'll make everyone
> happy. I suggest Jonathan picks a set of viable times (e.g., times
> that do not overlap with the WS-Desc or WS-Arch calls) and then
> we rotate amongst those on a weekly basis. Some times will be not
> great for some. Such is life.
>
> Sanjiva.

Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2003 14:01:31 UTC