Re: PFTF next telcon

This is ridiculous- we'll never find a slot that'll make everyone
happy. I suggest Jonathan picks a set of viable times (e.g., times
that do not overlap with the WS-Desc or WS-Arch calls) and then
we rotate amongst those on a weekly basis. Some times will be not
great for some. Such is life.

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>
To: "'Glen Daniels'" <gdaniels@macromedia.com>; <public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:18 PM
Subject: RE: PFTF next telcon


>
> That doesn't work well for me, as the runs right up to the ws-arch telcon.
> I need at least a half hour for lunch.
>
> 12:30 EST?
>
> Dave
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Glen Daniels
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 8:55 AM
> > To: 'public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org'
> > Subject: RE: PFTF next telcon
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 1PM EST works for me.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Amelia A. Lewis [mailto:alewis@tibco.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:34 AM
> > > To: Sandeep Kumar
> > > Cc: jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr; gdaniels@macromedia.com;
> > > youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr; public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org
> > > Subject: Re: PFTF next telcon
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 08:03:51 -0800
> > > "Sandeep Kumar" <sandkuma@cisco.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes, 6:30 am pst is very early for me. Is 9:30 or 10:00 am
> > > PST suitable to
> > > > everyone?
> > > > That is right after WSD meeting.
> > >
> > > It would be *really* nice to have some sort of break between
> > > meetings.  Half an hour would be enough, but it would really
> > > help to be able to stand up and walk around a bit.  So I'm
> > > not thrilled by 9:30 (12:30 EST); would prefer 10:00 (1:00
> > > EST), half an hour after the end of the WSD meeting.
> > >
> > > Amy!
> > > > - sandeep
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org
> > > > [mailto:public-ws-pnf-tf-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of
> > > Jean-Jacques Moreau
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:42 AM
> > > > To: Glen Daniels
> > > > Cc: 'FABLET Youenn'; public-ws-pnf-tf@w3.org
> > > > Subject: Re: PFTF next telcon
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sounds ok to me, although I suspect this might be too early for
> > > > West Costers.
> > > >
> > > > Jean-Jacques.
> > > >
> > > > Glen Daniels wrote:
> > > > > That time would be OK with me, though I might suggest :
> > > > >
> > > > > a) we take 90 minutes, since we'll presumably be doing
> > work on the
> > > > scenarios and it would be good to get some momentum going
> > > > >
> > > > > b) we augment the teleconference with IRC, so that we can
> > > share syntactic
> > > > examples/proposals without saying "open-bracket, wsdl colon
> > > feature, uri
> > > > equals quote..." :)
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Amelia A. Lewis
> > > Architect, TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
> > > alewis@tibco.com
> > >
> >
> >

Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2003 12:37:16 UTC