It appears that LC 263 [1] indicates actually an editorial problem in the specification as Section 2.1 does not define the contentType attribute, but defers it to Section 3.1 instead. We propose moving the paragraph: {The [normalized value] of the contentType attribute information item MUST be the name of a IANA media type token, e.g., "image/png","text/xml; charset=utf-16" and indicates the media type of the [owner element]. } >From Section 3.1 to Section 2.1. where the attribute is defined. Also add the following statement to the same section: { For a discussion of media type values and their definitions, see RFC2046[IETF RFC 2046] } --umit [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues-c ondensed.html#x263 [2] http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2046.htmlReceived on Thursday, 6 January 2005 00:59:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:08:53 GMT