RE: xmlmime --> invalid namespace prefix?

Regardless, the prefix has been changed in the current draft, since we
have gotten this comment at least three times.

 

________________________________

From: public-ws-media-types-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-media-types-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Orchard
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 10:02 AM
To: Roger L. Costello; public-ws-media-types@w3.org
Subject: RE: xmlmime --> invalid namespace prefix?

 

I believe "xml" prefix is reserved for xml specs, and this area seems
within purview of xml to me.  We discussed this a while ago and believed
we could legally use the prefix..

 

Dave

 

________________________________

From: public-ws-media-types-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-media-types-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Roger L.
Costello
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 7:06 AM
To: public-ws-media-types@w3.org
Cc: 'Roger L. Costello'
Subject: xmlmime --> invalid namespace prefix?

 

Hi Folks,

 

Another problem dawned on me: "xml" is a reserved string.  Neither tag
names nor namespace prefixes may begin with xml.  Thus, xmlmime is an
invalid namespace prefix.  /Roger