W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-media-types@w3.org > November 2004

Re: Last call comment: Why?

From: Yalcinalp, Umit <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:25:06 +0100
Message-ID: <99CA63DD941EDC4EBA897048D9B0061D0E07DC50@uspalx20a.pal.sap.corp>
To: "'public-ws-media-types@w3.org'" <public-ws-media-types@w3.org>


Hi Ian, 

The usage of contentType attribute is indeed optional. It is not required per section 3. [1]. Therefore, we are not clear why you think there is a problem. 

Regards,

==umit 

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-media-types/

Received on Thursday, 18 November 2004 20:25:49 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ian Hickson: "Re: Last call comment: Why?"
Previous message: Ian Hickson: "Last call comment: Why?"
Maybe in reply to: Ian Hickson: "Last call comment: Why?"
Next in thread: Ian Hickson: "Re: Last call comment: Why?"
Reply: Ian Hickson: "Re: Last call comment: Why?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:08:52 GMT