RE: Attributes Task Force (time change on weekly meeting)

Hi WSDL-attribute-ers,

Monday works for me but can we make it 12:30 instead of 12:00? If it has to
be 12:00 then I will be late some days. But this could be ok.

Regards,

William

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Graham [mailto:sggraham@us.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 1:45 PM
> To: VAMBENEPE,WILLIAM (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
> Cc: 'Sanjiva Weerawarana'; w3c-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Attributes Task Force (time change on weekly meeting)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hmm... finding a time is going to be tough! :-(
> 
> It looks like the 11-12 EST slots are all taken with other 
> WSD WG business,
> task forces etc.
> 
> Is 12:00 Monday a better time?    Tuesday is standing 
> strawman, but if most
> of the participants are interested in another day, we can be had.
> 
> btw, we should continue this conversation on the Attributes 
> mailing list.
> 
> sgg
> 
> ++++++++
> Steve Graham
> sggraham@us.ibm.com
> (919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
> Emerging Technologies
> ++++++++
> 
> 
> 
>                                                               
>                                                               
>            
>                       "VAMBENEPE,WILLIA                       
>                                                               
>            
>                       M                        To:       
> "'Sanjiva Weerawarana'" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, 
> w3c-ws-desc@w3.org, Steve   
>                       (HP-Cupertino,ex1         
> Graham/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS                                      
>                          
>                       )" <vbp@hp.com>          cc:            
>                                                               
>            
>                                                Subject:  RE: 
> Attributes Task Force (time change on weekly meeting)         
>             
>                       05/22/2003 12:28                        
>                                                               
>            
>                       PM                                      
>                                                               
>            
>                                                               
>                                                               
>            
>                                                               
>                                                               
>            
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Even though I am in California, I would prefer 11-12EST. 
> Partially because
> I
> want to make sure Sanjiva gets plenty of sleep ;-) but also 
> because I am
> already booked at 12:00EST on Tuesdays...
> 
> William
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 4:13 AM
> > To: w3c-ws-desc@w3.org; Steve Graham
> > Subject: Re: Attributes Task Force (time change on weekly meeting)
> >
> >
> >
> > Since I'm likely to be the single Asian participant, let's
> > go with 12-1 .. that's actually ok with me as that's 10-11pm
> > in Sri Lanka.
> >
> > Sanjiva.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Steve Graham" <sggraham@us.ibm.com>
> > To: <w3c-ws-desc@w3.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 2:12 AM
> > Subject: Re: Attributes Task Force (time change on weekly meeting)
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > It looks like the 11-12:00 Eastern slot is "prime time" for
> > activity.  All
> > > days are taken except Friday, and I cannot do every other Friday.
> > >
> > > So, we can either do 12:00-1:00 Eastern on Tuesday, but
> > this is beginning
> > > to get quite late in the day for Asia and 10:00-11:00 is
> > perhaps a might
> > > early for the folks on the west coast of the US.
> > >
> > > So lets go with a new "strawman", 12:00-1:00 Eastern on 
> Tuesday, and
> > > perhaps we can change that if there is a lot of folks from
> > Asia that want
> > > to participate and very few or no one from the west coast 
> of the US.
> > >
> > > sgg
> > >
> > > ++++++++
> > > Steve Graham
> > > sggraham@us.ibm.com
> > > (919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
> > > Emerging Technologies
> > > ++++++++
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >                       Steve
> > >                       Graham/Raleigh/IB        To:
> > w3c-ws-desc@w3.org
> > >                       M@IBMUS                  cc:
> > >                       Sent by:                 Subject:
> > Attributes Task
> > Force
> > >                       w3c-ws-desc-reque
> > >                       st@w3.org
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >                       05/21/2003 02:14
> > >                       PM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > All:
> > > Per the Rennes F2F, lets continue the discussion on
> > Attributes.  W3C has
> > > set up a mailing list for the task force,
> > public-ws-desc-state@w3.org.  If
> > > you are interested, please go ahead and subscribe [1] and
> > welcome to the
> > > "Attributes Task Force".  For more details on the initial
> > proposal as
> > > presented in Rennes, please see [2].
> > >
> > > Some notes on the Attributes Task Force:
> > >
> > > Purpose:
> > > In the context of "stateful Web services", there is a need
> > to model, as
> > > part of the WSDL definition of the service, the elements of
> > the publicly
> > > available state made available to the service requestor.
> > OGSI[5]  has the
> > > notion of "serviceData". CORBA IDL has attributes [4]. This
> > task force is
> > > formed to explore how to model a Web service's state in WSDL.
> > >
> > > Scope:
> > > Review and refine the initial proposal made in Rennes.
> > Report back to the
> > > Web services description working group by the July 31
> > face-to-face in
> > > Toronto.  Currently, this Task Force is for members of the
> > Web services
> > > description working group only.  We can expand
> > participation based on the
> > > chair's approval (Jonathan Marsh).
> > >
> > > Inputs:
> > > Initial proposal [2], WebDAV[3], Corba attributes[4], OGSI
> > > (serviceData)[5].
> > >
> > > Deliverables:
> > > A proposal on how to proceed.  Should "attributes" be
> > standardized at all?
> > > Should this be core WSDL 1.2?  An optional module?  Some
> > other standards
> > > body?
> > >
> > > Approach:
> > > We will use the mailing list  (public-ws-desc-state@w3.org)
> > and a weekly
> > > telecon.  Current "strawman" proposal for the weekly
> > telecon is Tuesdays
> > > 11:00am-12:00 EST, starting Tuesday, May 27 with our initial call.
> > >
> > > The time between now and July 31 is tight but doable.  Lets
> > get going!
> > >
> > >
> > > [1]http://www.w3.org/Mail/Request
> > > 
> [2]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0045.html
> > > [3]http://www.webdav.org/specs/
> > > [4]http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/02-06-39.pdf
> > >
> > [5]http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/ggf/draft-ggf-ogsi-grids
> > ervice-29_2003
> > -04-05.pdf?download
> > >
> > >
> > > sgg
> > > ++++++++
> > > Steve Graham
> > > sggraham@us.ibm.com
> > > (919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
> > > Emerging Technologies
> > > ++++++++
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 22 May 2003 17:37:04 UTC