W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-state@w3.org > June 2003

RE: Some requirements

From: VAMBENEPE,WILLIAM (HP-Cupertino,ex1) <vbp@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 19:17:54 -0400
Message-ID: <68157FD469848D45B9CBC2833AD552800215945D@xsun02.ptp.hp.com>
To: "'ksankar@cisco.com'" <ksankar@cisco.com>, "'Savas Parastatidis'" <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>, "'Steve Graham'" <sggraham@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "'David Snelling'" <d.snelling@fle.fujitsu.com>, "'Jim Webber'" <jim.webber@arjuna.com>, "'Paul Watson'" <Paul.Watson@newcastle.ac.uk>, public-ws-desc-state@w3c.org, public-ws-desc-state-request@w3.org, "'Steve Tuecke'" <tuecke@mcs.anl.gov> 


Hi Krishna,

> 	IMHO, it would be better if we address the security interfaces
> in this specification, leaving, of course, the 
> implementations to choose
> whatever mechanisms. I differentiate between mechanics and 
> mechanisms -
> we define the mechanics, the platforms do the mechanisms. In 
> that sense,
> these security aspects are NOT orthogonal to the serviceData 
> mechanics.

Can you please expand on this? I am not sure I understand where you draw the
line. Could you provide a specific example?

Regards,

William
Received on Friday, 13 June 2003 19:17:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:17:41 GMT